Recent comments
Restaurant Cuisines
Arab,
American,
British,
Cafe,
Chinese,
Doughnuts,
Fast Food,
Filipino,
French,
Indian,
Iranian,
Italian,
Juices and Smoothies,
Lebanese,
Malaysian,
Mediterranean,
Mexican,
Moroccan,
Pakistani,
Pizza,
Portuguese,
Sandwiches,
Seafood,
Spanish,
Steakhouse,
Sushi,
Thai,
Turkish,
Vegetarian,
Qatari,
All Restaurants
i need juicy debate!!

Guys I'm bored...
Where are the discussion forums....the conflict of opinion ...the pros and cons...
.........THE ADRENALINE.....
I would love to see a challanging /contraversial topic of discussion....is it to much to ask??
- lilipink's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
getinandstayin said
dont tempt me lili ...dont tempt me lili :)
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
Super7 said
lili I've got one for ...lili I've got one for you......why does everyone always go on about the US being an army of occupation and saying they are trying to liberate Iraq or support the liberation of Iraq.
Mr Zarqawi was in the papers today going on about defeating america in Iraq
Surely everyone in the world knows that as soon as people stopped exploding themselves america would leave in seconds. UK would. We don't want to be there it is bad for politics and it is bloody expensive.
So why all this chat about liberation (and not just from the terrorists)?
tg1234 said
Good One Super 7...Let me ...Good One Super 7...Let me add a wonderful letter published in the Local Press of Saudi Arabia ( A Thoughtful one indeed)..
Lili are u similar to this crowd??When your sink doesn't work you blame the Americans for it??
http://www.arabnews....
Out of Ideas? Then Curse the West
Abdul Rahman Al-Habib • Al-Watan
Criticism is good when it is constructive. The problem is when criticism decays into harping. All too often, useless criticism becomes an impulsive habit.
Arab writers and columnists have a tendency to affirm populist notions, whether they’re good, bad, factual or false. They write what people want to hear. They write not to educate or challenge the readers’ notions, but rather to affirm the readers’ pre-conceived opinions and views. These types of character-driven, pandering scribes care only about elevating themselves and winning the sympathy of their fans.
For a writer, is there anything easier than serving up paragraphs of emotion-driven rhetoric? Is there anything easier than repeating platitudes and re-hashing clichéd ideas?
If a columnist runs out of ideas, there’s always one ace in the deck, one thing that is bound to get a cheer from the choir. It’s almost too easy. Out of ideas for the day? Simply write an article cursing the United States of America! That’s an easy way to earn a day’s pay.
Never mind entering the difficult path of hard research and analysis of problems in our society, or in their society, or problems shared by both societies. Forget about it. It’s too easy to toss out some hackneyed diatribe against America.
Unfortunately, writers who do not fall into the trap of cheap shots and one-trick ponies, writers who practice disciplined criticisms about topics closer to home, end up being drowned out.
The problem here is a lack of understanding about the process of criticism. Our society is one that lacks dialogue and rejects the mere concept of criticism. There is a severe lack of understanding behind criticism as an application. In our society, criticism is a synonym for defamation.
As a result, many columnists resort to criticism as a form of attack, against each other, against the West, against America. It is rare when we find a thoughtful attempt at understanding others and their views that come, just as ours do, from their cultural, political and social backgrounds.
Oddly enough, some of the megalomaniacs with word processors often ask for thoughtful opinions on their work from their colleagues. Yet they do not make any effort to come up with constructive criticism to return the favor.
Indeed, some writers strive to be objective. They attempt to give up self-aggrandizement and do a little critical thinking. But all too often even they end up blaming their subject (i.e., the West, America, other writers) for lacking adequate understanding. They might also confess that the problem with “them� is that “we� haven’t adequately illustrated our goodness.
But then when something tragic happens, such as an act of terrorism against the West that is committed by one of our children, our “critics� end up falling back into the trap of painting complex conspiracy theories that depict us as the victims.
When we, Arabs and Muslims, ask ourselves why we are behind in development, the answer is always satisfactory: because of the West and its agents, of course! And when we ask ourselves why the West is developed and advanced, the answer is always satisfactory: because the West stole the sciences of our ancestors and they are still plundering us to advance themselves!
Can you find prettier, more populist answers than this?
Super7 said
I thought my post on ...I thought my post on rereading was a little ambiguous when I say they ( in the first line) I mean the terrorists (rather than america liberating iraq). i.e. why does everyone say that they want to liberate iraq from the US when clearly US would love to leave. I reckon if there were no explosions for a month the US would be out of there
getinandstayin said
We should be addressing the ...We should be addressing the real issue. thats, why are the US/UK there in the first place?
Certainly wasnt WMD's. Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. yes he was a crackpot dictator but there are so many more like him who are often supported by the west. So tell me, why are they there?
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
butterfly said
Giasi: OIL Lili, glad to see ...Giasi: OIL
Lili, glad to see you´re back :) I need juicy discussions too. My mind is going numb
Super7 said
Well in finance we refer to ...Well in finance we refer to money that has already been spent as a sunk cost. Sunk costs should play no part in decision making as they are "sunk". The US and the UK are there.
The topic that I chose to bring up for debate was whether the fight for liberation should be against the US/UK who would leave the second everyone stopped fighting.
If you want to discuss your topic then go ahead but it is not an answer to mine. Remember GIASI no marks for not answering the essay question but just writing what you want to talk about
getinandstayin said
No... im sorry... my ...No... im sorry... my question is relevant. Once you determine the real reason why the US/UK forces are there to begin with, then you can begin discussing who is liberating who. I seriously cannot believe that the UK/US forces would leave as quickly as you suggest if everyone stopped fighting. The fighting is a direct result of US/UK being self proclaimed self appointed saviours of the downtrodden who incidentally are much worse off now than under the previous tyrant.
The only reason the US/UK forces went into iraq was to destroy a perceived threat to israel. Fuelled by neoconservative passions, the US administration were hell bent on toppling saddam and placing a government in power that would serve its interests. The UK just went along because there was the possibility that rich pickings were to be made. Unfortunately, a miscalculation was made and the quagmire exists because of it.
Just look at the US sabre rattling going on with Iran at the moment. Again, its israel thats fuelling the flames. a government, i hasten to add, that is the only middle east country to have WMDs (over 200 nuclear warheads).
There is no denying the fact that the US led invasion on iraq has done more to increase terrorism than any single act in history. More civilians have died as a result of this invasion in a few years than saddams entire reign. poverty, crime, terrorism, kidnappings, executions...etc etc etc..... what positive things has the US led invasion acheived? nothing.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
Angelo said
GIASI Well ...GIASI
Well said,
Respect
Angelo
Super7 said
again I score you zero. ...again I score you zero. Rambling about the invasion increasing terrorism is off topic.
Do you or do you not believe it would be better for iraq in the future (not the past) for people to stop fighting against US and UK and instead employ their efforts in developing the country?
Clearly the answer is yes.
Fat Clemenza said
didn't the british, the ...didn't the british, the french fight the Nazi invasion?
Isn't it the right of "ANY" people to choose its own destiny rather than seeing a bunch of thieves storming their country for its wealth and expect them to believ they're here to free you?
The whole world warned the US of the mess that would arise in case they invaded Iraq but Bush, in a brave step to follow prophcecies he received from above his empty head decided to do it anyaway. An author once said "One million people cannot be wrong".How about 5 billion?
another tunisisan thinker once told his french colonialist superiors "You cannot go from wealth to freedom but you can go from freedom to wealth". Freedom has no price.
And please, open up your eyes and tell me how could you possibly believe in the freedom of the Iraqis when they were better off under Saddam (who was already the worse thing that could happen to them). To free Iraq???? What about invading a sovereign country under the excuse of searching for weapons of mass destruction that no one found before or after the invasion?
What about the Israeli atomic bomb and its occupation of Palestinian soil and the massacre of its inhabitants???
What about bombing Fallujah with chemical weapons to the point its inhabitants were found calcinated in their own homes?
What about Abu Ghraib?
What about the stealing of oil and the protection of oil fields when there's no one to protect the civilians?
What about the civilians killed by yakee soldiers because they were driving too fast or too slow?
What about the italian journalist who got ambsuhed by US soldiers and whose bodyguard got killed (RIP)?!
This is a new era of colonialism. In the 19th century european countries invaded Asia, Africa and other parts of the world to bring what was called "civilisation"... we all know it was not the case but rather, natural ressources were the reason.
Oh what a coincidence! Now the US is invading countries to bring democracy but is occupying a country and stealing its oil rnatural resources!
If Bush, Bair and Berlusconi were really about freedom and democracy please tell me who stole the 2001 US presidential election? Who tied up the medias and named unpatriotic and marginalising anyone who disagreed (psst I got a hint his first name is George)? Who lied and changed secret services reports and destroyed documents proving there were no grounds to invade Iraq (Blair)? Who is going form one corruption scandal to the other ever since he became a public figure (Berluscaoni)? And these people are to be trusted with the future of a whole country? Please!
If Saddam was brought to court (I just wish it was a real one with real credibility so the sentence would make sense) then bush and blair and berlusconi shouold too.
They blame Saddam for using chemical weapons? Bush did the same thing in this invasion? Hell his father did the same thing during the first gulf war (remember the depleted uranium bombings????). The kiling of innocent people? ... Please don't make it too easy for me. I just don't know where to start.
"Build their country" what a noble plan. Again, weallth always came after freedom. And with what money? Iraq is the second largest oil reserve in the world but yet Iraqis don't even have enough gas for their cars.
I wonder what you call a terrorist. If you fight for your freedom and die, I don't there's nothing more honorable that that. And I doubt that the Iraqi rebellion is dumb nough to bomb their own fellow citizens. When a crime is committed you should ask yourself "who will it benefit the most?".......bombing civilians: that will discredit the rebellion and make the US UK stay legitimate. Bombing mosques (shiites against sunnis) will only lead to civil war and thus make the US UK invasion even more legitimate. Abducting foreigners: that would benefit both. But until now each fex hostage said they were treated well and were never abused. But if we look at what the americans and the british did to the Iraqi prisonners one would wonder if it is not better to get abducted by the guerilla thna by the freedom coalition.
Giasi, thank you. I was going to talk about the Israel problem but you did better than I would have.
Fat Clemenza
Super7 said
Fat clemenza I think you are ...Fat clemenza I think you are missing the point. Try to put your rage about the invasion behind you and consider only the future.
Answer just one question which is " Do you think it would be better for the people of Iraq if the insurgency stopped?"
Clearly Iraq would be a rich and prosperous country if the fighting ceased. If you are suggesting that to stop fighting and live peacefully would give legitamacy to the US/UK invasion and that that is a bad thing then the expression I would have to use is "cutting off your nose to spite your face".
The fact is, and I think every reasonable person believes this, that if there was no insurgency and "resistance" then the US would have far less influence than it does now.
Policitally it is not good for the US to be in Iraq but they are forced to stay in such numbers because of the insurgency. Their leaving would create a power vacuum and even more problems.
Stop "resisting" and things would be a lot better for everyone living in Iraq.
Super7 said
Fat clemenza I think you are ...Fat clemenza I think you are missing the point. Try to put your rage about the invasion behind you and consider only the future.
Answer just one question which is " Do you think it would be better for the people of Iraq if the insurgency stopped?"
Clearly Iraq would be a rich and prosperous country if the fighting ceased. If you are suggesting that to stop fighting and live peacefully would give legitamacy to the US/UK invasion and that that is a bad thing then the expression I would have to use is "cutting off your nose to spite your face".
The fact is, and I think every reasonable person believes this, that if there was no insurgency and "resistance" then the US would have far less influence than it does now.
Policitally it is not good for the US to be in Iraq but they are forced to stay in such numbers because of the insurgency. Their leaving would create a power vacuum and even more problems.
Stop "resisting" and things would be a lot better for everyone living in Iraq.
Helloqatar said
Fat Clemenza, I aasume the ...Fat Clemenza,
I aasume the bombing in Egypt is because of the US also, those couldn't have been terrorism types, they were only saving Egypt.
If the Iraq people want to fight the US/Brit, why are they killing each other in the name of Islam.
Some things do not make sense but all the problems of the world are the fault of someone else. I would like to see the people of this area decide that killing people is wrong. When they decided to protest the Danish Cartoons, they killed each other. Give me a break!
If you have a problem, work to solve it, quit crying about how it is someone else to blame. And killing people is not a solution, if killing helped, Israel and Palastine would have been solved.
butterfly said
guys, Irak has very grave ...guys,
Irak has very grave problems, but the presence of US/UK/Italy makes matters worse.
You cannot force democracy into a country. I personally think that democracy will never work in the ME, at least for the next few decades. What these people need is a strong, honest, down to earth leader.
USA, Uk etc are not goodies trying to restore order. When, and if, they leave, violence and sectarian crisis will continue. Maybe they will end up killing eachother for years to come, maybe they will work together to rise a prosperous country. That´s up to the people of Irak, not to Bush and co.
Super 7, you say that politically it does not beneficiate USA to stay in Irak and I couldn´t disagree more with you. Bush admin is nothing but a war economy and war politics. American presence in Irak is indeed very positive for his administration, and for as long as the lies about bringing peace and democracy to Irak are sold to american people,it does not harm his popularity.
Giasi, Fat, why is that in this area every single problem and killing is blamed on Israel? Please move on.
tg1234 said
The way I understand Fat ...The way I understand Fat Clemenza,GIASI and (may be) butterfly is...
1. We need to have an attitude of water off our backs..if Things like Kuwait gobbled up by Saddam, Darfur or Bosnia happen...Someone forgot to read the letter by a Saudi Reposted by me above...
2.Killing of 100s of Children in Russia for FREEDOM is good.In the middle east..Everything that happens wrong is because of Americans...All the people who have loud voices of protest against the Americans..wont open their mouth to their dear leaders (they are heaven sent)...
3.Conclusion: We need More Saddam Hussains, More Hosne Mubaraks,More Qaddafis, More Musharrafs, More Mulla Omars, ..if Possible..Please give us more Eidi Ameens...May God endow the Middle east with more popular leaders like these than the Satan Americans..
Super7 said
Butterfly of course they are ...Butterfly of course they are trying to restore order. Don't start about whether or not they are there is correct. The fact is they are there and to suggest they are not trying to restore order is ridiculous
Fat Clemenza said
Super7: What future can a ...Super7:
What future can a country have when doesn't even own a piece of freedom and when decisions are taken without the poeple's consent?
Me missing the point? I don't think I am but I surely think you're just trying to tuck things under the carpet.
How do you expect insurgency to stop? Iraq has become the land of the US-UK soldier killer, anyone from the world who got beef with america has now found a place to settle it. Add to that the local criminals who are taking advantage of the situation to make money (abudctions, arm deals, executions...). But more important than all that, is that the US coalition never had any legitimacy. Hoping for the insurgency to stop is like hoping that tomorrow we wake up in love with one another, no hate, soldiers with flowers in their canons and no poors or heomeless people......IMPOSSIBLE. So therefore you need to come back to reality and realise that only Iraqis should decide (and are legitimate to do so) about their future and choose their leader. If they were granted the right to self-determination, without any foreign power interfeering, I think they'd choose to build their country.
What we think in the west is right might not be percieved so in other parts of the world, including the M/E. You can't oblige people to be like you or share your values.
After the collapse of the Ottoman empire, th world witnessed the rise of 20 new state nations. That was almost a century ago. Did they live under democracy ??? Surely not. They had dictators who have been winning elections by 99% for decades (Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Syria...) and who were protected by the west because they protected Western interests (unless your name is king Faisal from Saudi Arabia and you threaten to block oil exports if Palestine is not free, or if your name is G.A NAsser and you proclaim sovereignty over your own soil -i.e the suez canal-). So maybe democracy will never work in the middle east, maybe their future will be brighter if they have one strong and fair leader that earns his credibility from his own people, not foreign powers.
"Stop resisting and everything will be better". Ok, go say that to those who lost everyting under this bloody occupation. I don't know what facts you're talking about. You keep using that word as if you had the supreme truth in your hands. Go grab your history books and tell me which country submitted to occupation and became prosperous????
I have no rage to express. My country is not being occupied but it fought occupation when Nazis invaded it. If it didn't then maybe my nickname wouldn't be Fat Clemenza but rather Big Bosch.
Hello Qatar,
Don't be putting words in my mouth please. Go to my post on the Aljazeera thread and read what my opinion is about the killing of innocent civilians.
Did you go make an inquiry about who put these bombs in mosques or open markets? Again, who's likely to make the most of the situation? Iraqis?? Come on... I know you're smarter than that.
As long as you're an intruder in some place, it will always be your fault when things go wrong, whether it is true or not. If the Iraqis were given full power over their destiny and fail to be happy, then they could only blame themselves. But for right now, Americais making decisions for them. Did you know america is directly involed in more than 80 conflicts worldwide?????!!!!!
We (I say we cuz too many of us here in Europe are in this case) need to bear in mind and never forget that what we are enjoying here in terms of freedom to choose our leaders and decide for our future is a wild dream in other parts of the world. Please state one, just one legitiamte government in the M/E?...Zero... Why?? Cuz they all came to power through coups or ridiculous elections. So therefore, the least tensnion could lead to potential disasters. So let's tak about the cartoons since you brought the subject.
People rallied and were angered and took to the street. Who did they have to stop them? Police and army officers who've been whooping their behinds and prohibiting any opposition for decades. Do you think they were killing each other because of the cartoons? Look at what happened in Paris a few months ago when suburban youngsters took to the street. Paris and the major cities in the country became battlefields (no one forget the burning cars and buildings we saw in the news). But even in such situation, Police officers used tear gas and sticks to send them back home. The governemnt was not affraid to be ousted, it just sent ts troops to bring order back.
In third world countries they use real bullets against demonstrators because each and every signle regime is in a paranoid state and fears it would loose its power.
Butterfly,
Don't worry, I'm not the kind f person who's looking for excuses to balem others. But America's foreign policy is dictated by Israeli intersts rather than pure selfish American ones (and we all know it). In case you like to read:
http://www.guardian....
Who bombed Iraq in 81 when it built a nuclear Plant?. WHo currently owns 200 nuclear war heads but calls for sanctions against Iran?. Who has been pressing for the US invasion in Iraq, Israel was one of them. And who refused to give legitimacy to a government elected in a clean and internationnally supervised elections?
No Isreal is not responsible for everything. But I find it hard to believe that it is innocent.
Fat Clemenza
Super7 said
I can't be bothered to read ...I can't be bothered to read all that sorry. Read a couple of excerpts and you missed the point in those. Anyway keep resisting the "occupation" and good luck to you.
Fat Clemenza said
no comments ...no comments
lilipink said
Thanx butterfly glad to be ...Thanx butterfly glad to be back!
guys, friends,loved ones...glad to hear from all of u all at once....
Fat clemenza.....WELCOME!!!
i'm speachless and i agree with all of u whole heartedly.....i couldn't have said it better my self.......except i regret to say..helloqatar and suuper7(as always)
Thanx super for starting this one...i don't know what drives me more nuts your stubbornness(sp??) in the face of fact and persistance or that alien u have posted as u'r picture!
I'll answer your question with a no!
People can't stop resisting because unlike u they have no faith what so ever that the US wants to leave....and the reason for them being in Iraq is important 'cause it's the reason for the resistance...remove the cause and their will be no insurgency..let's not play the chicken and egg game....We were all around when cowboy G.W.B decided to shoot his way into Iraq as part of his "war on terror" to "free the Iraqi's and bring democracy from the land of "democracy"....If it was so right then why did the Iraq's resist??
People who have the luxury of being safe in their home with their feet up watching the news and sipping god knows what can easily talk about complience...........Give me an example of a people that sat back and just waited for their invaders to pack up and leave.
helloqatar...i didn't understand that bit about the bombings in Egypt...kindly explain..
tg1234......i read the letter and i'm not one of those people who blame others for their bad fortune......i take full resposibility for my actions and i believe we as arabs and as muslims should too.........but u must agree that the US has its hands in alot of cookie jars.........they set themselves up to be blamed.
that's what meddling gets you......And the Kuwuiti issue was an arab affair and it was wrong to involve the US.
What was that about Russian children???
U must have misunderstood fat and GIASI....i'm positive that's not what they ment.....And I'm sure most arabs know that their leaders aren't that great........read the arab newspapers and u'll see.
.lili.
.lili.
tg1234 said
Lili Time has come to prove ...Lili
Time has come to prove that you are responsbile for your action...Arab Affair?? Wonderful...Hamas regime is about to collapse without "American" Money..Put your money where your mouth is..and Support Hamas WITH MONEY..So that he can walk the talk on the bluster of living with olives...
Everywhere the Americans have gone..They have been invited!!! YES..They have been invited..Just look at the behaviour of an Arab Police man with a whiteface who has just runover an Arab man with his Suburban..You will understand what I mean...
tg1234 said
...What I mean from the ......What I mean from the above..is ..with the help of the local police and the authorities he will be on his first flight back home..(This happened in the land of the Pure..Saudi Arabia)
...By the way If that Same White face does the same thing in developing India..he would be living in Jail for ever..As a group of Brits did when they tried gun-running...Purulia Arms drop...Havn't heard of it..Google and check...
Moudir said
Oil and Pipelines, There is ...Oil and Pipelines,
There is only one three letter word to describe US foreign policy in the Middle East: OIL, and by extension, PIPELINES, cuz you have to trample on other people’s land to get to the nearest port.
In order to have a good grip on supplies, you have to destabilize the regions where oil is produced, so that your help and presence be required, to protect the producers, and allow the free flow of oil.
How to destabilize a region? Find or create an ally in the region, provide him with money, arms and make him into a tyron. When he becomes out of control, replace him. When most of the Middle East was under British occupation, Balfour Declaration in 1917 facilitated the immigration of Jews into their ancestral lands (even if International Law does not recognize rights to ancestral lands for any group of people in the world). Second World War was a good excuse to create Israel and right the wrongs that were perpetrated to the Jewish people by the Christian West. The US was first to recognize it in 1948.
Even if current day Germany after having repented and paid hefty reparations, had offered (same size) land for Jews to relocate into the Bavarian mountains, another destabilizing agent would have to be created in the Middle East to maintain constant turmoil in the region.
Is this for liberating people…!? or is it democracy on the march…?!? or is it about people risking their lives on the way to the polls…?! Yes it is, for the man on the street who hasn't lived long enough to know where the Middle East is located on this planet, or for the US man on the street, who thinks Iran is located where Australia is. And no, it is not for the people who live here in a TRIBAL society. It is tribal at work, it is tribal at home between spouses, it is tribal everywhere. They want a strong leader, a provider (who can carry a gun, or who can have friends who carry guns). When the leader dies, his son replaces him (just move your finger around the map from the Sheikhdoms, to Jordan, to Syria, Egypt (now on the way), Libya (now on the way), Azerbaijan, etc.) Sweet dreams for Opposition parties???..…ha! They will be blown up!
The moral of the story is; get used to it. As long as we’re thirsty for Middle Eastern oil, there will be turmoil, destabilizing agents, “liberators� and “protectors� with big SUVs.
Moudir
Super7 said
tg1234 you seem to be a good ...tg1234 you seem to be a good honest racist with a massive chip on your shoulder.
BTW it might not have been the man with the white face's fault. I can't believe the carefree manner in which everyone crosses the road here. It is almost as if they actually believe in fate ;)
Also it is not for nothing that Qatar is soon going to have a place in the Guinnes book of records as having the most dangerous roads in the world
Saudi Arabia - land of the pure. That is among the funniest things I have ever heard
tg1234 said
Super With Due Respect..I am ...Super With Due Respect..I am not at all racist..The fault was 100% of the guy..He was my colleague..the beauty of it is..He was back after 2 years..Despite being given such a huge respite..He kept mouthing those four letter words with alarming frequency..He kept boasting about it all the time...
I had to tell him one day..to develop sense of ethics..and to pray lord for small mercies...for not only he had made huge amounts of money..but got away with murder..literally...
Again I have nothing against anyone..When you are in a discussion..the purpose is not to abuse or ridicule but cite examples...Even if Qatar is having the most dangerous roads..Shouldn't the law be applied farely and sqaurely with everyone?? Is it being done anywhere in the mideast??
Americans in the 1990s were invited..they negotiated the terms of the war and then moved in..So if someone claims that Arab affairs shall be left to Arabs shall be living in Cuckooland...
tg1234 said
...Actually if Arabs are ......Actually if Arabs are truely united..The Americans will simply suck it up and state to state relations will be the only thing happening...Its not too far when GW Bush said sorry several number of times when an American plane landed at Hunan Island in China...
My point above is simple..the Americans are only exploiting local weaknesses...If Some one thinks money alone is a sign of strength..its as obvious as daylight that its not..probably the trust in own people is...If the biggest strength of the middle east...its people...are not considered a source of threat..but a source of strength...things will change dramatically..I guess democracy is coming in its own halting way...and change will be for everyone to see...
It was long ago before Gulf War 2..that Turkish Parliament refused American bases ..despite a fee of $ 25 Billion offered to them as landing rights...what did the Americans did?? Sucked it up and moved on...
lilipink said
will look into that one ...will look into that one tg1234..thanx......and as i said it was wrong to involve the US in what was an Arab affair........unfortunatly we have amoung us (like all races/peoples) cowards and opportunists who don't nessecarily have the arab worlds intrests and well being at heart when making desicions.
Democracy is a process that has to run it's course at it's own good time...not before......The whole middle east was occupied by various regimes for a n extremely loooong time.....We didn't have the opportunity or time to develop a democracy........people are still afraid of persecution if they express any sort of political opinion let alone vote(i talk of the common street man not the intellectual)
Give us time......although i doubt we'll be left alone to get up on our own two feet......it's exactly like dweller explained.....destabilization is a must......
I wonder why the US arn't sucking it up and moving on out of Iraq....u know with all the opposition and all???.lili.
.lili.
Fat Clemenza said
Tg1234, Please tell me ...Tg1234,
Please tell me you’re joking. You can’t possibly believe the things you typed.
Hamas: elected government in free and internationally monitored elections. They won. That’s democracy right? The people deciding for its future. That’s what the US and the UK invaded Iraq for, right?
You withdraw necessary aid because people you don’t like came to power? You know what we call that??? Black mailing if not bribery and thus corruption.
Wonderful values that I completely despise. But if the US wants to withdraw their aid, which they already did, that would only prove what people like me think: They ain’t about democracy; they’re about maintaining puppet governments who will serve their interests.
I was reading an article about Hamas officials who declared that their ministers will only be paid 1500 dollars a month. Do you know many governments who would do that? The Fatah Party became famous for its corruption and its members became millionaires thanks to their membership card. For instance, the apartheid wall that is dividing even further Palestinian soil is being built by with concrete bought from a company owned by who? Mr Al Qorei, the former Palestinian PM.
I don’t know what you call that, but I call it pure dedication to the people. And maybe that’s what America is afraid of.
Let’s say the Palestinian government does collapse, that will only make them even more legitimate in the eyes of their people and give even more discredit to the US and the EU.
But they can keep their money if its purpose is to deprive the people from its right to self determination. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other countries have already engaged in supporting them and Condoleeza Rice failed to have their agreement to isolate Hamas.
Cutting financial aid like Israel, the US and the EU are doing is collective punishment and that’s exactly what bombers do when they blow themselves up in civilian crowds.
America invited??? By who? By themselves I guess.
SO you do admit they’re exploiting weaknesses, which means American intentions are not so noble. You know what history has taught us tg1234? Those who forget the past are bound to live it again. America’s foreign policy will lead it to its own destruction. America is only planting the seeds of hatred in the hearts of the people they’re oppressing and give them more reasons to want its destruction. That’s what happened to the Nazis, the Soviet Union, pre WWII Japan, Iran's Shah...
I hope you'll be able to be mercifyl towards yourself and look to the world with humble eyes. I sincerely do. Good night.
Big Fat Clemenza
tg1234 said
Lili, Thanks for dignified ...Lili, Thanks for dignified Response...
Super Would rather attack people either by giving zero marks, wont read responses (saying they are long)..or say someone is racist..I keep wondering who has massive chip on his shoulder??
Fat: I will just write a few lines on Hamas..(This is not my original thought)..
Within the recent weeks columnists have be holding forth on
"Collective Punishment of the Palestinian People" and "Paying for a
democratic Choice" with respect to the issue of suspension of aid to
Hamas Govt. Palestinian people "voted out" Fateh not "voted
in" Hamas. It was less of an "ideological victory" for Hamas then a
"default choice" because of the corrupt and inefficient Fateh
administration.
As an outside observer who knows the middle east , I see the reaction
of Non-Muslims and Non-Arabs when an organisation called "Islamic
Jihad" Sends a person who blows himself away killing innocent women
and Children and Hamas Govt is critical of Abu Mazen for critisizing
too much. It makes that American and british supension of aid look noble..
Hamas should understand the ground reality. They have been voted to
office to govern and solve the problems of the Palestinian people.
Yeah!! Everyone understands that its a struggle for the rights of
Palestine. However the militant mindset needs to be replaced with a
responsible and presentable conduct. Those columnists who think that
Arab Money can solve the problem and Ismail Hania can continue hold
forth, surviving on olives, are living in stone age. Long term impact
on the mindset of Non-Muslims who still constitute 5.0 billion shall
be understood in this era of increasing globalization. The price of
Oil remains high because the world is willing to consume it. However
when the "price" to pay for this consumption will become
un-acceptable, the world has enough technology and will to be able to
find alternative resources. With all Arab newspapers splashing the
picture of the mother of suicide bomber on the front pages, people
outside the middle east will certainly form their own set of opinions.
By the way no one around the world is scared of "Islamists" coming to
power in the mideast. Extremists are a part of every society and
democratic process evens them out. Their bogey can't be used as an
excuse for authoritarian regimes and terms like "collective
Punishment" tend to scew the facts. I dont think the west is afraid of Hamas. They just want them to discard the "destruction of Israel"
clause from their manifesto, something Hamas can't achieve even in
their dreams.
Fat..Next Question..Who Invited the Americans?? Please read lili's response...It has been understood...In the first Gulf war when the Iraqi hit Al-Khafji and were about to hit Safaniya..(The richest Oil reserve in the World)..the Saudis were actually negotiating with Iraqis for Mercy..When it did not work out..They invited the Americans..The Negotitations went on for 4 Weeks...The total bill of $80 billion..bank rolled by Saudis and Kuwaitis...
Second War..Americans were invited and operated from Kuwait..The Supplies went from Kuwait and Saudi..
Iran War..: If a bombing happens..its NOT just the Israelis', a large section of rich Gulf states, suspicious of Shia Iran's intentions who are working behind the scene, Mr Mubarak has already let the cat out of the bag..
tg1234 said
Fat I am disappointed with ...Fat I am disappointed with your line on Have mercy on myself..When I write these remarks..I dont move a muscle..Its just an academic debate of throwing in ideas..and others counter arguing it...
I have seen enough of these sterile debates about butcher sharon and stupid bush...Please attack the idea..not the person...If the whole debate is about doubting the intention of the person and not focused on idea..I would rather keep my counsel to myself...
Its not worth it..
Fat Clemenza said
so you're just confirming ...so you're just confirming what I said, thank you. "Invited by puppet governements who are not even legitimate in the eyes of their people." Of course they'll turn to uncle sam, cuz uncle sam put them in power and protected them. When a government is entrusted by its people it strugles along with them and rely on them.
I was blessed with years spent abroad, and I did meet saudian Mr everybody, I don't remember one them saying the US were welcome either during the 1st gulf war or second and let's not even talk about what they think about US presence in their country cuz that's a bit off topic and obvious to everybody (I guess).
Helloqatar said
Lets back up and ask the ...Lets back up and ask the right question, who is killing who and for what reason?
1) US & Brit troops are killing some of the Iraq people.
2) Muslims are killing some of the Iraq people.
3) Who is killing the most everyday? 1 or 2
4) Who is killing Palistine people?
5) Who is killing Isral people?
6) What is a realistic plan to stop the killing, if US leaves the ME, will the killing stop?
7) Does anyone with commen sense believe that the country of Isral is going away, no matter how much killing happens?
8) Back to why would anyone kill people in Egypt, what did it prove?
Bottom line is that killing is not a solution, but it seems that a certain group thinks it will help some problem. I don't understand how anyone can defend the death of these people. I don't see how anyone can defend what happened on 9-11. Maybe if the ME had stopped Osma, Iraq would not be invaded. Maybe if the ME had stopped the Egypt bombers, Iraq would not be invaded. Who and what part of the world launched the attack on 9-11?
Fat Clemenza said
Just don't forget that Bush ...Just don't forget that Bush team had plans to invade Iraq even before he came to office and taht 911 was the right excuse. Saddam and Osam hate one another and had no ties. The reason to invade Iraq?
1) WMD............the UN and the whole world said there were none. The US found none.
2)Saddam was linked to 911............The wholeworld thought it was a ridiculous theory. Even american thinkers thought so.
3) Bring Democracy...............The Iraqi people got nothing until now and were better off under Saddam (even if he was the worse thing that could happen to them).
Helloqatar said
For the record, I think Bush ...For the record, I think Bush was wrong to invade Iraq. Saddam was a problem, going into Iraq was not the answer.
That out of the way, can you answer why certain religions seem to be behind most of the killing? If the ME wants the US to leave, they are going to have to deal with the BAD people in their countries that are blowing up other people, most who have done nothing.
The US used 9-11 and Osma as reasons because the ME couldn't or wouldn't stop the attacks. How do we stop the bombings? Give and answer that will work, The US leaving Iraq will not stop them, they were started before US entered IRaq.
dweller said
I also was against going ...I also was against going into Iraq and am convinced it was about oil.
Others believe it was because Bush couldn't spell Afghanistan.
The only link between Al-Qaeda and Iraq was the letter Q
Fat Clemenza said
LOL! ...LOL!
scmasse said
Fat - And you picked on ...Fat - And you picked on Super for not leaving any constructive comments. Shame on you for just laughing at people's opinion. Just when the debate was getting interesting you pull this?
I guess I know how high to rate your opinion now since you appear to be a hypocrite.
Fat Clemenza said
ahh come on scmasse. Who did ...ahh come on scmasse. Who did I laugh at?
Dweller said : "The only link between Al-Qaeda and Iraq was the letter Q".
It was aimed at no one. Is it because we're debating that we can't crack a smile or laugh? There was nothing personal. If I offended anyone then I apologise. I did not mean it. :)
Can I at least smile.?
getinandstayin said
Super... im sorry, but your ...Super... im sorry, but your opinion is just that, an opinion. the facts are clear.
1. the UK/US invaded a soveriegn country on false pretences.
2. the problems now are as a direct result of the UK/US presence.
3. they are not wanted there except by a minority.
your view that the UK/US should stay to restore order to a mess THEY created is like setting someone on fire then pissing on them. Im afraid imperialism died out decades ago. I think the UK should concentrate on keeping hold of the falklands.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
butterfly said
Yeah, Giasi!!!! aND Super, ...Yeah, Giasi!!!! aND Super, Gibraltar belongs to Spain, give back to us
lilipink said
helloqatar I find it very ...helloqatar
I find it very disconcerting that you always link "a certain religion" to the sh-- that happens around the world......
Like any region/race/people we have our share of bad apples but the constant meddling doesn't make it better.
I would like to make myself clear and islam too.......suicide is a crime in islam and forbidden in our sharia......I am therefore against suicide bombings as they are a cowardly way of dealling with problems ......there is a difference between martyrdom(putting yourself in grave danger for a higher cause but you might survive) and suicide.
Having said that i would like to say that in my opinion these suicide bombings are a sign of desperation and last resort from a people who have been massacred, tortured, thrown off their land and refused entry into it.Palestinians are scattered all over the globe with no identity and no real home....
The jews keep harping about the holocaust and then commit genocide in Palestine.Destroying houses with their inhabitants in them.....Why do we just say "poor Israel all those dead women and children" but never seem to bother with all the arab women and children ?.
Stop the settlements and give the Palestinians land to live on and the bombings will stop.
The bombings and violence in Iraq probably aims to try and make it too costly for the US/Uk to stay .....They might also be revenge.....
Let's not forget the media that chooses to focus on certain aspects and trivialize others.......Propaganda and brain washing is not just a MD thing u know..lili.
.lili.
Fat Clemenza said
Let's not forget that the ...Let's not forget that the main architects of the second Iraq invasion changed their minds. Do y'all remember Richard Pearl, Fukuyama and the likes? Well they now publicly admit they were wrong. But I think it's too late (even if "later is always better than never"), hundreds of thousands were killed and many more humiliated.
Another US congressional report : "It is unclear how US efforts are helping the Iraqi people obtain clean water, reliable electricity or competent health care," said a report presented by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) to Congress, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
UN report : "A drama is taking place in total silence in Iraq, where the coalition's occupying forces are using hunger and deprivation of water as a weapon of war against the civilian population," Jean Ziegler told a press conference Friday, October 14, reported Reuters.
So please. Anyone out there who still thinks that it's a good war is invited to think again. The same people who fiercely called for this war are now distancing themselves from "W" but when a mind is weak and ignorant, it relies on arrogance and stubborness.
Fat clemenza
lilipink said
On reading your post again ...On reading your post again super7 i can't help but ask....
Is there a doubt in anyones head that the US is an occupying force??....have u of all people bought into all that /-a-t-//-a-t-/$£%& about freeing the Iraqis and bringing democracy.....Who gave Bush the right to go into another country and inforce whatever the hell he thinks he's inforcing .....all that against UN recomendation...
So it's ok to prance into any country u don't particularily like and start making decissions and changes for it's people??
And 9/11 I still have serious doubts about it being done by arabs let alone muslims...but if it were ...that's no excuse....The whole arab world was against the terror attacks , above all the arab goverments.....Arabs died in the towers too u know......To penalize a whole country for the mistakes of a handfull.....real mature...great politics!
I just want to ask one question...
who had thew most to gain by the attacks???
It's not a conspiracy theory but when weird stuff happens i always think of the movie"Wag the Dog".......There all diversion tactics to keep the worlds eyes focused on one thing while real injustice is being practiced elsewhere.
(N.B I am not trivializing the pain and suffering that was a result of the 9/11 attacks but a couple of wrongs don't make a right)
.lili.
.lili.
Helloqatar said
Lilipink, Is Osma a muslim, ...Lilipink, Is Osma a muslim, was he behind the 9-11 attacks? If not him and his group, who did it. For better or worst, it is hard to keep a secret in a free open society like the US. Things seem to come out to the public, which is different than the middle east where the press and the people are controled by the rulers.
Does anyone really think the "crack" reporters at the Gulf Times can tell us the truth about somethings. They can't even report on which resturants have been closed because of health issues. They can't tell us why every major road around every shopping center is under construction at the same time. They are SCARED, if I have to believe somebody, it will be the "free" press, not the government press.
Helloqatar said
Lilipink, on the subject of ...Lilipink, on the subject of religion and S*** happening, at this point in time, most of the killing is being done in the name of what religion?
I want the US out of Iraq, I want the west bank returned to Palastine, which they would still have if they hadn't started the 67 war. They had it and lost it.
I want the killing to stop in the name of all religions of the world, but right now, I fear one religion more than others.
dweller said
Question; Is the GT still ...Question; Is the GT still government controlled?
butterfly said
Hello Qatar, do you actually ...Hello Qatar, do you actually think that USA is a free open society where is hard to keep a secret? Do you actually think that american press is not controlled by the "rulers"? You must be kidding.
Fat Clemenza said
Just remeber how the medias ...Just remeber how the medias were asked to shut up or face anti patriotism accusations in the aftermath of 911 or even now during this bloody war.
It took US medias three years after the invasion of Iraq to start asking quesitons about bush's policy and it started with the N.Y times.
lilipink said
Osama might be a muslim but ...Osama might be a muslim but if he was behind the 9/11 attacks then his actions have no connection to islam...don't take my word for it read the qoran and you'll find out....
"Palestine starting the 1967 war" is a historic inaccuracy...For one thing the war was basically fought between Israel and its Arab neighbors Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. following Egypt's blockade of Israeli shipping in the Straits of Tiran
www.dcmilitary.com/a...
I also feel u are misinformed about Islam and tend to stereo type...check out the following address:
http://en.wikipedia....
He put it quite nicely when he said that to judge islam by terrorrists is like judging christianity by the Klu Klux Klan.
.lili.
.lili.
Super7 said
lili ....always in ...lili ....always in denial.
Muslims always going on about how it is not the actions of muslims and read the koran.
Actions speak louder than words and I'm sorry to say that the only people currently killing people in the name of their religion are muslims.
If you all took some responsibility for these actions then perhaps it might stop one day but alas all you ever say is that there is no connection to islam etc.
Islip36 said
I’m new to this country ...I’m new to this country and visited this site in order to find out helpful information about my new home. Wow I had no idea of the level of anti Americanism. My ignorance, my fault... As an American, some of the beliefs expressed here surprised me. I did read the whole blog quickly so forgive me that this is not verbatim.
I was surprised that some of those who posted here, feel that Americans are so pro Israel. Culturally we don’t think of ourselves as a Jewish nation and my Jewish friends feel marginalized by our predominately Christian culture.
Our foreign policy has been pro Israel, but I feel much of this is due the Average American being ignorant when it comes to ME political issues, and this is certainly true when it comes to Palestine.
I was surprise that some of those who posted, questioned the connection between Osma , Al-Qaeda, and 9/11. To be honest, in the US, that connection is not questioned.
I’m a New Yorker, I suffered personal loss that day, so it is hard to comment on 9/11 without tears ……I will say that I think that act, that evil act, was done to create division in the world…I think that Osma knew how America would react. We did not act out of our religious beliefs, we acted out of fear. People who are frightened are easily manipulated. Do I think there were plans drawn up for the invasion of Iraq from the moment Bush got in office….Yes. Would they have been as easy to push on the American people, if there hadn’t been a 9/11…No. Does Osma care what has happened in Iraq, the suffering, I will guess,,,,, NO. Has America become the great eval force in the eyes of the world Yes….. Could Osma may be have predicted that…yes…
Is the Arab, identity, maybe more united, I think yes and that’s a good thing. Are more Americans aware of the plight of the Palestinian people may be ,, yes, and that’s a good thing.
Lastly I think as an American I need to feel the shame that comes when some one does something evil in the name of something I love…in this case….invading a country, in the name of my country. Likewise, I think if I were Islamic I would feel shame that someone did an evil (9/11) in the name of something I loved, Islam .
Islip36 said
I’m new to this country ...I’m new to this country and visited this site in order to find out helpful information about my new home. Wow I had no idea of the level of anti Americanism. My ignorance, my fault... As an American, some of the beliefs expressed here surprised me. I did read the whole blog quickly so forgive me that this is not verbatim.
I was surprised that some of those who posted here, feel that Americans are so pro Israel. Culturally we don’t think of ourselves as a Jewish nation and my Jewish friends feel marginalized by our predominately Christian culture.
Our foreign policy has been pro Israel, but I feel much of this is due the Average American being ignorant when it comes to ME political issues, and this is certainly true when it comes to Palestine.
I was surprise that some of those who posted, questioned the connection between Osma , Al-Qaeda, and 9/11. To be honest, in the US, that connection is not questioned.
I’m a New Yorker, I suffered personal loss that day, so it is hard to comment on 9/11 without tears ……I will say that I think that act, that evil act, was done to create division in the world…I think that Osma knew how America would react. We did not act out of our religious beliefs, we acted out of fear. People who are frightened are easily manipulated. Do I think there were plans drawn up for the invasion of Iraq from the moment Bush got in office….Yes. Would they have been as easy to push on the American people, if there hadn’t been a 9/11…No. Does Osma care what has happened in Iraq, the suffering, I will guess,,,,, NO. Has America become the great eval force in the eyes of the world Yes….. Could Osma may be have predicted that…yes…
Is the Arab, identity, maybe more united, I think yes and that’s a good thing. Are more Americans aware of the plight of the Palestinian people may be ,, yes, and that’s a good thing.
Lastly I think as an American I need to feel the shame that comes when some one does something evil in the name of something I love…in this case….invading a country, in the name of my country. Likewise, I think if I were Islamic I would feel shame that someone did an evil (9/11) in the name of something I loved, Islam .
getinandstayin said
Super7. All of this ...Super7. All of this terrorism did not create itself in a vacuum. There are underlying causes. You say only muslims are killing for their ideology? are you serious? i had you down as a pragmatic and logical person well informed in history and politics. i am disappointed.
if you think that the UK/US occupation forces are not killing for their ideologies then you are burying your head in the sand. The main difference is that their foreign policies are the trigger for all the terror we are seeing of late. The are the CAUSE not the RESPONSE.
I would strongly advise you to familiarise yourself with the intricacies of the middle east socio-political scene and western foreign policy over the last decade before you post your analyses.
Helloqatar. All media is subject to outside control. Take MSN FOX CBS CNN... all the media outlets in the US are controlled by forces allied to the US Neoconservatives and their biased reporting during this conflict is evident.
I would rather have the GT knowing that it is openly censored than a false outlet claiming freedom but subject to underhand manipulation.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
Super7 said
I did not ever mention the ...I did not ever mention the word ideology. I said religion.
Furthermore although US and UK forces do indeed kill civilians they do so by accident. It is not their intention to kill the innocent. Intention is of critical importance.
The terrorist representatives of Islam target innocents in the name of their RELIGION.
Once again it seems that you are refusing to accept responsbility for actions committed on behalf of islam. A lot of peoples in the world are not that happy with US/UK foreign policy but only the islamic terrorists blow up western civilians at every opportunity.
But then you always need to find someone else to blame other than yourself. Not one person on this site from the islamic camp has ever put their hands up and said "fair enough, there is a problem in our ranks we need to tackle it". It is always you did that you did this its your fault you brought it on yourself.
And again this has nothing to do with my question which none of you will answer. Always banging on about palestine and israel and neo conservatives. The question just to remind all of you was " would iraq be better off if the insurgents stopped blowing themselves and otehrs up?"
Yes. If they did Iraq would be rich and prosperous. The US would leave in a shot.
As it is the US have to stay. Giasi your point about pissing on them is idiotic. Like I said the invasion is in the past so just for the sake of argument lets say that they did set you on fire. Would you as a burning person prefer to be pissed on or just left to burn. Pissed on I am sure because although it might not be the best way at least you would go out eventually and maybe survive.
Butterfly you can't have gibralter back.
Super7 said
Gibraltar ...Gibraltar
butterfly said
Hmmm! Yes there is something ...Hmmm! Yes there is something very wrong with killing people in the name of any religion. I wish one day the world will be free of these nutters. Hopefully they will all blow themselves up at some point so islamic terror runs out of suicide bombers. In the mean time, I hope all muslims will start to condemn terror. Lound and clear.
Is this an excuse to invade a country, super? Oh, yes, sorry, US/UK kill by accident, of course. It happens when you go invade a country, there are always casualties and desperate people who will fight against the invasion It´s unavoidable, but no bad intentions. No hard feelings about it.
Can you please remind me why America invaded Iraq? Did u actually believed all that crap about WMD´s and bringing democracy to the Iraqi people? Don´t you think that USA, UK, Spain, Italy etc had other interests? Don´t you think that all the violence is the perfect excuse for america to stay in Iraq? Oh, wait a sec, what was your question again? Would Iraq be better off without all this violence? Hell yes. It would. They are so stupid, the insurgents, blowing themselves up like there is no tomorrow. I watch them from home, on my tv, safely and confortable, and think: look at these idiots, why they don´t find a job, find something to do and raise a prosperous country?.
Ah, look, I´m changing my mind, what the..., How can you raise a prosperous country when it has been invaded? How desperate you have to be when you kill your own people? Yes, they are idiots, but they are very very frustrated, so it is understandable to a certain degree. Divide and conquer. You say that Us will leave when violence stops. But the thing is, violence will not stop UNLESS Usa leaves. And even then, it will take years to restore the mess.
butterfly said
I´m going to Gibraltar, ...I´m going to Gibraltar, kick some red hairy [Let's not get blocked by the Telco]es, take it back.
Super7 said
Butterfly I never mentioned ...Butterfly I never mentioned the invasion. That is a separate issue. All I said was about the logic of continuing to fight for freedom. Stopping fighting would make more sense and be better for the Iraqi people.
You could go to Gibraltar and spain and start blowing everyone up. But I don't think that would speed the return of the rock.
You can't have gibraltar because the people of gibraltar don't want us to give it back. Plus I think it is funny.
butterfly said
Super 7, my dear friend with ...Super 7, my dear friend with sexy ears... Imagine that you go to...lets say Ibiza...or Alicante... and ask everybody who lives there what they would prefer for the place to be: british or spanish. They would say british. Why? Because they ARE british. Same in Gibraltar. They prefer for the rock to be part of GB coz the place is populated by british!.
clonclusion: Why asking?
Not funny...
getinandstayin said
Super. how you can detach ...Super. how you can detach the suicide bombings from the invasion is beyond me. The only reason these "insurgents" are fighting is the same reason any occupied insurgency has fought throughout history. Against an unjust and illegal oppression.
I can imagine the insurgents saying "you started this, now well finish it". Cant you fathom the fact that maybe the insurgents dont want the coalition to leave under the coalitions terms. That would be far too easy.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
Super7 said
I am not detaching anything. ...I am not detaching anything. My question was...well look above.
So if you believe they are better off fighting on then explain why you think they are better off fighting on.
Don't say anything about the legitamacy of the war because that is not the question.
You might think that they are within their rights to fight on because of the illegitimacy of the war but again that doesn't answer the question.
Say why it is better or worse for them to continue fighting.
Fat Clemenza said
They will be better off ...They will be better off because...simple answer for a simple minded question: That will push the US UK forces out. Why? Because people like you thought they were going to Iraq with a flower in their canons and be welcomed by the Iraqi people. WHy didn't it happen? Because the Iraqis suffered even more under the US occupation than under Saddam.
Fighting for freedom was never meant to be easy. Remind who said on May 10th 1940: " "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat." ? His people could have been better off if they hadn't tryed to resist the enemy's bombings. DOn't you think so?
Fighting is what any person would do. Show me how America is helping the IRaqi people? DO you honnestly believe America is helping Iraqis and that they would be better off under US occupation???
Read this:
Quote: "Let's not forget that the main architects of the second Iraq invasion changed their minds. Do y'all remember Richard Pearl, Fukuyama and the likes? Well they now publicly admit they were wrong. But I think it's too late (even if "later is always better than never"), hundreds of thousands were killed and many more humiliated.
Another US congressional report : "It is unclear how US efforts are helping the Iraqi people obtain clean water, reliable electricity or competent health care," said a report presented by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) to Congress, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
UN report : "A drama is taking place in total silence in Iraq, where the coalition's occupying forces are using hunger and deprivation of water as a weapon of war against the civilian population," Jean Ziegler told a press conference Friday, October 14, reported Reuters.
So please. Anyone out there who still thinks that it's a good war is invited to think again. The same people who fiercely called for this war are now distancing themselves from "W" but when a mind is weak and ignorant, it relies on arrogance and stubborness. "
Please give me examples of erica providing help? I want proven facts, not what you think or imagine.
And don't forget that W is part of the neocons, backed by the chrsitian coalition. That before going to war he was asked if he consulted his father "Bush father". His reply scared the mess out of me : "I consulted a higher father" And this guy, unable to obtain decent grades at school is supposed to be entrusted with the destiny of a whole country? Please!!!
Also, don't forget taht wherever US forces go, US evangelists follow. It is the same thing taht is happening in Afghanistan and is happening now in Iraq. They make people's lives miserable and then come singing the Gospel : " hallelujah , we are here to save you in the name of Jesus".
Part of the evangelist's ideology is to prepapre the world for Jesus's return. And taht starts by implementing christianity all over the globe, including where??... you guessed it. The Middle East. So aside from the cursades, the building of Amrica thanks to indian blood and African slaves, people are still being killed in the name of christianity. So please super 7...
Islip36,
Please do not jump to conclusions like accusing some of us of being anti americans. Those were the accustions held by your governemnt towards any dissident voice or any person who asked questions about their failures or incompetence.
We are being critical because your country's foreign policy led by a group of necons that your people RE-elcted is behind so much trouble in this world. But of course, there are people in the US that have always distanced themselves from W Bush. We are trying to brign facts and debate about facts, not preconceived ideas taht we try to put as facts. WE DO NOT GENERALIZE. Unlike some of us here.
Islip36 said
oh well, Fat C, please ...oh well, Fat C, please pardon me if I generalized......I miss understood....so you are pro american?
Helloqatar said
If I am an American, am I ...If I am an American, am I welcome in Qatar. Are there some people in Qatar who dislike all Americans because of George Bush? Can I dislike the leaders of countries in the ME because they are backing the killing of people who have done nothing.
I will admit that the war in Iraq is wrong, I have told my elected officals, I am working to get the US troops out of Iraq. Have you told your leaders that terrioism is wrong and they need to stop it, have you turned in a terrorist today. What are you doing to stop the killing.
There are people in the streets on American protesting the War, where are the people in the streets of the Middle East protesting the terrorist. You can't protest the terrorist because you aren't free to have an opinion with permission from the leaders.
Fat Clemenza said
My leaders are in Europe not ...My leaders are in Europe not in the M/E. But if you watch the news on other than mainstream channels, you'll see that people do express themselves in that part of the world, taht's why ome of them get killed.
Islip36,
I am not pro nor anti american, I am pro myself. But I spent a few years in your country and I still go there every year. If I were a bonified anti american, I wouldn't maintain the ties I have there.
lilipink said
Islip36. First I'd like to ...Islip36.
First I'd like to welcome you to the country and to the forum and make clear that no-one is anti-American but we strongly oppose your countries foreighn policy represented in the constant meddling and the whole cowboy theme George has chosen to adopt.
Most of us (I can speak for myself)like America alot ...It's a beautiful country with a pop culture that is loved and immulated by most of the people of the world........your goverment and your media though would like you to believe that you are hated.....they create a sense of fear and isolation so that cowboy georgte can come along and be the protector.
I apologise on behalf of all muslims .But I can't take responsibility for something I have nothing to do with...All of us are hurt by any act of terror.And to say it is in the name of islam (Which by the way means submission to god, peace and purity)well I won't go into that again.
Please inform me helloqatar ...of which MD leader/s do you refere to .To my knowledge all MD leaders denounce terror attacks and do anything possible to stop them ....Please differentiate between terrorism and insurgency.
super7: to answer the question that youv'e been carrying around this forum like a trump card .......BZZZZZZZ WRONG ANSWER!!.....
I actually think it would be better if the insurgency stopped bombing themselves and innocent civilians and started to adopt a more effective way......They need to bomb the military targets only, if that is possible.....When the cost is too high they will hopefully go home...........I think the American public should be livid with anger......mothers have lost their children/ wives and husbands their loved ones /children have been orphaned....was it worth it???i saw how youn g those soldiers looked ....brainwashed into thinking it would be an in/out situation ..a piece of cake...until they saw the real world....I think hollywood contributed alot to the grandiose notions of "shock and Awe".
""Actions speak louder than words and I'm sorry to say that the only people currently killing people in the name of their religion are muslims.""super7...what about the israelis, the Serbs, Chechnya?.lili.
.lili.
tg1234 said
Lili.. If this is juicy ...Lili..
If this is juicy debate..with people picking on each other and repeating the same argument ad nauseum..then the earth is flat !!
Fat Clemenza said
I thought it was round...:( ...I thought it was round...:(
Moudir said
You're right tg123, it is ...You're right tg123, it is not a juicy debate at all, it is a load of hooey.
There was one bored person at the outset, who brought out all the other bored people out of the closet !
Doha seems to be a scary place. People have nothing useful to do with their spare time.
tg123, they are all suggesting solutions without knowing or addressing the real problem which is almost one century old, and in my opinion, it has to do with the 'doctrine of destablization'. Read my previous comment on this post dated 2006-04-27.
Moudir
psss- Was Giasi's meeting ever held? for the bored and the whiners?
Moudir said
. ....
butterfly said
Moudir, you didn´t remeber ...Moudir, you didn´t remeber to change your diaper this morning, did you? So much dirt must feel unconfortable, no wonder it´s making you so miserable.
Off you go, please, wipe it off
copyright
butterfly
Fat Clemenza said
Moudir, If we're so bored ...Moudir,
If we're so bored what are you doing here?
Moudir said
butterfly, I understand it ...butterfly,
I understand it is difficult to accept the truth when it is not sugar-coated.
My message is to use your imagination to come out of boredom. You have done your fair share of complaining about absolutely every single aspect of Doha life, and to the opinion of other posters on this site, you have been the unhappiest butterfly in town. We all agree that raising a toddler is a difficult thing. However, ‘Mummy I’m bored’, is the weapon for the immature.
May He shine His wisdom upon you.
Moudir
getinandstayin said
Moudir.. I totally agree ...Moudir.. I totally agree with your "doctrine of destabilization" explanation. However, the presence of Israel in the region and its fear of its arab neighbours also drives US foreign policy too. Both of these factors will guarantee the middle east remains a hotbed of instability and conflict for decades.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
butterfly said
Couldn´t be easier, but a ...Couldn´t be easier, but a sad person like you will never know or experience such a joy. May He shine what? what stupid thing to say, just so you know, wisdom is not something that He suddendly shines on you.
Moudir said
Thank you Giasi, Cool heads ...Thank you Giasi,
Cool heads always prevail.
Moudir
Super7 said
I don't think you have ...I don't think you have prevailed Moudir however that doesn't necessarily prove your statement incorrect as you have a distinctly uncool mind.
That is of course my definition of an uncool mind. I am at liberty to use my definition because the expression "cool mind" has hitherto never been heard.
"doctrine of destabilization" sounds like always blame others for my problems. Seems to be a theme around here. Used to it now, think it is a cultural thing
getinandstayin said
oooh super7. "cultural ...oooh super7. "cultural thing"? that sounds a little racist. you might aswell just say "you arabs are so stupid and im so intelligent that im going to patronise you with my aloof superiority and rejection of your paranoid conspiracy theories", then again i might just be paranoid (im sure theyre listening in on my phone calls).
One thing that is quite evident is that (contrary to what the press write), the average man on the street in the middle east is far far more informed about international politics and history than his average counterpart in the west. It remains a fact that the west (france,italy and the UK) sowed the seeds of strife in the middle east in the last century. History books all agree. You may find it a bitter pill to swallow but it remains the truth.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI
Super7 said
Gutted I just lost my reply ...Gutted I just lost my reply when internet went down.. this is not nearly as lucid
Giasi I do not think I "might as well say" that at all. There are aspects of my culture that are no doubt distasteful to many here. My love of beer for example. I don't believe that makes anyone more or less superior than another just different.
I also believe arabic peoples (just to preempt by saying "I believe" it is my opinion, from my experiences) to have a tendency for hyperbole (not with regard to problems incidentally) to be hot blooded and to wear their heart on their sleeve. I believe I come from a culture (although it appears to be less and less so) of stoicism and stiff upper lip (please excuse the cliche). A culture were the tendency is more "this is the situation what can I do to make it better" than to complain. Does this make the arabic ways worse,? Absolutely not but they certainly come across as alien.
The thing is that no amount of shirt tearing and rage and complaining will change the fact that the past is in the past. The arabic people seem to be doing very little to help themselves improve the situation that they find themselves in. Blaming everyone else may make them feel better but it won't help change anything.
Fat Clemenza said
Of course they'll others for ...Of course they'll others for their misfortune since others are supporting their oppressing governemnts!
Do you honnestly believe that Hosni Mubarak, Ben Ali and the likes would remain in power without foreign support? What planet are you from Super7? Please do yourself a favor and grab a history book, but since you refuse to link the past to the present, then please read and listen to what political prisonners in arab countries have to say about their rulers. I can't help but put you in the same bag as a white supremacist when I read your last post. Your speech about you expressing your belief about other peoples is just nauseating. Can you tell me where you're from so others can tell you what they think of you "race"???
You want to deal with the present only? Good, that would very honorable. In that case why can't you ask your country to stop meddling in other countries' internal affairs so arabs, black africans, and latinos can stop blaming the west for their misfortune???
Helloqatar said
Dear Fat C, While you were ...Dear Fat C,
While you were listing rulers you didn't like, did you forget the one we live close to, who is not elected. Or is everything OK here, just not other places? Or is the lack of free speech really the problem?
Should every country has elected leaders?
lilipink said
well it is true that the ...well it is true that the further south you get the more emotional you get....Nothing wrong with that......You deal with your problems in a certain way super7 and we deal with them in another....we really don't like and don't find the need to bottle things up...why be opressed, repressed and depressed (in that sequence)...let it all hang out ...
It's not just the Arabs who are hot headed ...Iheard the whole mediteranean region is like that too....
Who says were not helping ourselves ...just give use time...if we can only fly under the radar long enough to put our act together it'll be sweet!!.lili.
.lili.
Fat Clemenza said
I don't see who you're ...I don't see who you're talking about helloqatar. Please calrify.
I don't think all leaders should be elected but He or she needs to be legitimately given access to power and remain taht the way until his or her people deicde otherwise.
I really do not think democracy will ever be implemented the middle east. Islamic civilization reached its peak when it had strong and fair rulers. Now we see coward who remain strong only to oppress their own people, but threat comes from the outside they run for cover and call the UN and the US.
Heres what I wrote ealier about this:
"After the collapse of the Ottoman empire, th world witnessed the rise of 20 new state nations. That was almost a century ago. Did they live under democracy after that??? Surely not. They had dictators who have been winning elections by 99% for decades (Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Syria...) and who were protected by the west because they protected Western interests (unless your name is king Faisal from Saudi Arabia and you threaten to block oil exports if Palestine is not free, or if your name is G.A NAsser and you proclaim sovereignty over your own soil -i.e the suez canal-). So maybe democracy will never work in the middle east, maybe their future will be brighter if they have one strong and fair leader that earns his credibility from his own people, not foreign powers."
Big Fat Clemenza
Super7 said
Sorry Fat C what on earth is ...Sorry Fat C what on earth is wrong about expressing my belief about other cultures? Different cultures behave differently. That is just a fact. I did not say any race was more or less able to do anything that would be racist.
Lili Exactly. You have your culture and I have mine. I was simply pointing out that just as mine might seem strange or unnecessary to you so yours can to me.
Fat C where on earth have I ever said anything about anyone remaining in power or otherwise with or without foreign support?
I know you believe yourself to be some sort of scholar of history but put away your baseless criticisms and don't assume anything.
butterfly said
I find it funny when you ...I find it funny when you mention "history books" as if they were a universal thing. History has been written and re-written too many times and it is subjcted to the writer´s perception of reality. It is not an accurate science. So when Giasi and Fat ask to look at "history books" I cannot help to wonder which ones you are talking about.
Fat Clemenza said
Butterfly, I could not agree ...Butterfly,
I could not agree with you more. Histroy were written and re written. That's why you can only take different ones, compare, analyze and then have your own opinion. There's mainstream books governemnts try to have kids learn from and there's other points of view. They surely aren't the universal truth, God bless you for saying it. That's why confronting different point of views would get us closer to the truth than relying blindly on one source.
Super7, dear super7,
What would this debate be without you...
Me a scholar? Surely not. And me thinking of myself to be a scholar? You must be kidding. I guess you're uncapable of taking a new look at yourself.
You asked me not to assume anything. Thanks, but I didn't. I just told you what your post made me feel like. Just like you expressed your feelings about other peoples. But you still haven't told us where you were from, so others could let you know wha they think of your culture.
But tell me, what do you call that? :"I know you believe yourself to be some sort of scholar of history..." Aren't you assuming anything?
Baseless criticism? ... It could be. Who knows.
Super7 said
Why am I incapable "of ...Why am I incapable "of taking a new look at myself"? What does that even mean?
I didn't say you were a scholar Fat C I said "you believe yourself to be some sort of scholar". This from your endless quotes, of yourself no less.
"Criticisms" related to your accusation of my lack of historical knowledge
You never really explained what is wrong with me describing different cultures as having different behaviour. Would you say that different cultures all have the same behaviour? Did I ever suggest that one "race" has any more or less capabilities than another?
Stop getting so fired up about me personally and debate the questions posed.
Super7 said
lilipink I am not sure that ...lilipink I am not sure that the Arabic peoples could be considered to be "flying under the radar". I think they are flying with a giant flashing neon light and massive sound system blaring heavy metal from underneath.
getinandstayin said
Regardless of what i think ...Regardless of what i think about super's "superiority complex" :) i have to agree with him on one point. The arabs are a little ineffective at action. Its all well and good to stamp your feet, burn flags and ban cheese, but when it comes to action, im afraid arabs fall flat on their face. Alot of this can be attributed to bad leadership. The arabs traditionally have been effective when well led, alas, no leaders have appeared (or left to live) to do this.
Arabs can only acheive an internationally respected presence when they behave as a cohesive whole. Not the fragmented racist tribes they choose to be. However, this is as possible as an arab reaching mars first.
Arabs only have two kinds of leaders. Dictators who rule with an iron fist and feudal monarchs who try and appease and bribe the masses and when that doesnt work, the stick is always in the background.
It is true that the west has exerted an unusual amount of influence over the middle east because of the mid easts strategic location and oil wealth. But why are people suprised? The west is only after its own interests and you have to applaud them for having the foresight over 100 years ago to plan for the future.
I attribute the wests continuous meddling for most of the problems in the middle east. however, they are putting their interests first and i dont balme them for it. The blame lies at the feet of the arabs for doing absolutely nothing and allowing their leaders to perpetuate this for so long. I balme arab leaders for knowing all this and using it to further their own personal ambitions at the expense of the masses.
As a leader, you have to be accountable to one of two things. God or the people. Historically, arab leaderships were based on faith and the sheer fear of god to rule wisely, to the point that leadership was seen as a huge burden to be refused. The west have a system where fear of the people ensures a reasonable amount of good leadership. Take this away and what do you have? arab leaders, governed only by thier own conscience.
Respect
GIASI
Respect
GIASI