Click here to learn more.
TAP OUT - OK for who??
Can we have a bit more information .. USA is always prepared for war ..
you're kidding right?iran and china is no news, both have had tough time with the states and war in any given moment will not be much of a surprise.but saudi arabia? str8 bullsh!t, man. you didn't hear about the arms sale of oct 2010? us sold $60.5 billion worth of weapons to saudi arabia. how do you expect them to start a war now?
Martians prepare to invade Earth.Sorry, I don't have any sources, facts or any thought-out reasons as to why this may be the case..........it's just true!Be careful now Y'all.
the context will be once again 9/11. The spotlight will come on S Arabia and Iran for thier supposed role in this. Are you people not aware of the Palestinian vote for Statehood next week and the Saudis declaration to the US - you choose us or Israel. The arab spring is a game changer.
hey slapper, i like you. i'm aware of all that and that the arab spring was mostly based on a pack of lies. but i still need a couple more details. sources, facts, and (more) reasons.
were going to take out France and California.
Greenland needs that smug look wiped off it's face to.
Can't stand those laplanders and the constant moaning about the 24hr dayligh :O(
us behaves as a cancer on mankind...
Playing the "Get Into Saudi Arabia free card"? Another view on this. http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/08/playing-get-into-saudi-arabia-free-card.html Recent developments among supporters of the US government’s version of events indicate that they plan to begin blaming Saudi Arabia for the attacks of September 11, 2001. There is, in fact, much evidence suggesting complicity by some elements within the Saudi government. But that fact only further implicates western powers due to the close relationship between the Saudi royal family, which runs the Saudi government, and deep state controlling interests that have partnered with and manipulated the Saudi royal family for many decades. Blaming Saudi Arabia would, however, make a lot of sense if seizing resources, including the world’s greatest oil reserves, was what the war on terror has always been about. and here comes the loyal media to prop up the propaganda machine From the Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028195/9-11-conspiracy-theories-Iran-Saudi-Arabia-helped-Al-Qaeda.html#ixzz1VarfVC1r Iran and Saudi Arabia helped Al-Qaeda carry out 9/11 attacks, claims new book By Ted Thornhill: 20th August 2011 As the 10th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, two authors who’ve analysed thousands of documents relating to the attack conclude that both Iran and Saudi Arabia helped Al-Qaeda carry it out. In the aftermath, both countries publicly stated that they’d fight terrorism and expressed their condolences, but The Eleventh Day, by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan, produces a compelling argument that they were actually complicit in the attacks.
Adey - that might be an option if the people of Greenland refused to play ball and stop any oil and gas exploration in its waters
my family lives in california how u suppose u gonna accomplish that sucka. u threatening people i think u need to be banned from this sight, and im a muslim>
that's some good evidence you got there. but do you know when the libyan rebellion was first planned? 1981, according to an old issue of newsweek. if anything, these guys prepare long before they want to start anything. i don't think they would sell saudi.a such a terrifying amount of weapons just a year before they fight them...
As some one who has worked with the armed forces in Saudi, I can safely say that the sale of arms does not have anything to do with actually going to war.
The USA has so much more at its disposal both logistically and technologically.
I also doubt very much whether the USA would go for war. they may work in the background for a regime change, but there is no logic to go to arms.
i know, i was just trying to point out that it would be a really dumb move to sell them weapons and fighting them afterwards. if they are planning to go to war, why the hell would they sell them weapons?!
Firstly, I cannot see any reason why the USA would go to war.
Secondly, the arms sales are to bolster the economy and provide jobs to the work force.
The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami was caused intentionally by a “tsunami bomb” – a nuclear weapon detonated in a strategic position under the ocean. Some reason that the technology is at least feasible since research into such technology has been conducted by the military as far back as World War II. According to declassified files, top-secret “tsunami bomb” experiments utilizing explosions to trigger “mini-tidal waves” were conducted off the coast of New Zealand in 1944 and 1945. ;)
The last world war between arabs and the us.I can take on that but it's too early now.The leader for the army (against US) still to be reveled.u can relax for now but have to be prepared
As long as George rat face W. Bush is hiding in Texas, no war for the good all USA.
Shock and Ah baby, let us get Iraq again.
can't trust them:Colonel Sanders, the face and founder of the fast-food giant, was rumoured to have left 10 per cent of his earnings to the Ku Klux Klan in his will.This sparked scurrilous rumours that the chain was being run by the KKK after his death, and that a drug was being used in the Colonel's "secret blend of herbs and spices" to render African American men sterile
Humanity is actually under the control of dinosauroid-like alien reptiles who must consume human blood to maintain their human appearance. Evidence for his conspiracy theory goes from Sumerian tablets describing the "Anunnaki" (which he translates as "those who from heaven to earth came"), to the serpent in the Biblical Garden of Eden, to child abuse, fluoridation, and the genealogical connections between the Bush family and the House of Windsor.
C4 - they sold weapons to Libyia and Pakistan. No problem attacking them. When the puppet stops acting as such - regime change comes into focus
C4 Reaper - Rebuilding America's Defences Sep 2000, by the PNAC document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests'.This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'as far into the future as possible', the report says. It also calls for the US to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars' as a 'core mission'.The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on the new American frontier'. The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must 'discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role'.The PNAC report also:lt refers to key allies such as the UK as 'the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership';lt describes peace-keeping missions as 'demanding American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations';lt reveals worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA;lt says 'even should Saddam pass from the scene' bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops -- as 'Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has';lt spotlights China for 'regime change' saying 'it is time to increase the presence of American forces in southeast Asia'. This, it says, may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratisation in China';lt calls for the creation of 'US Space Forces', to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' using the internet against the US;l hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: 'New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool';lt and pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes and says their existence justifies the creation of a 'world-wide command-and-control system'. Also have you seen Wesley Clarke's speech 4 years ago??? http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29129.htmFormer four star general and NATO commander Wesley Clark talks about the neocon plan to invade seven countries in five years. Included in the plan was an attack on Libya. Clark mentions the plan at two minutes, 26 seconds into the video.
Adey -you forgot to mention that Obama is a Marxist and AGW is a communist plot
correction:Obama is Marxist dinosauroid-like alien reptile.
OK - for USA
TAP OUT - in what way??
Adey - if you say so as you this is obviously an area of specialty for you
guys talk sense! War? u really think with so much debt issue, european crisis etc do u really think any country can afford to go on war? Think....