Exposing the Treacherous Three

Exposing the Treacherous Three:
Zio-Crusaders, Modernist Muslims, and Disinformationists

By Kenneth Sterling

Is it possible that the nearly 8 year 'War on Terrorism' is really a new Zio-Crusade -- an illegal war launched against the Islamic faith and Muslims and NOT about 9/11?
Well, according to former President George W. Bush and his former Secretary of State Colin Powell, that's exactly right, the 'War on Terrorism' is synonymous for their Crusade.
"This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while. And the American people must be patient. I'm going to be patient." (President George W. Bush in his Speech of September 2001)
"I (Secretary of State Colin Powell) called President Musharraf and said: 'We need your answer now. We need you as part of this campaign, this crusade'," (Powell says he invoked 'Crusade' in talk with Musharraf, March 2004)

But why would the American government and its allies initiate such a criminal war – a Crusade - which has left hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan dead or wounded, as well as, thousands of coalition soldiers?

The very nature of a 'Crusade' is two fold; to plunder resources and to change the religion of the conquered nation. The changing of the defeated people's religion makes it easier to subjugate them and guarantees economic and political control for the Crusader governments. So in this case, according to the |Zionist-filled American 'Think Tank' RAND Corporation, the resource to plunder is oil and the religion to change is Islam.

"The dependence of the West and Japan on Persian Gulf oil and the POWER and WEALTH that come from CONTROLLING that oil guarantee US interest in that part of the world for as far into the future as anyone can see." (RAND Publication, U.S. Nuclear Strategy for the Post-Cold War Era, Pg. 6, Introduction)

But America has been controlling the governments in the Muslim countries for a long time and has been receiving the revenue from the resources anyway. So why would they need to launch a Crusade?

The launching of the Crusade was necessary, according to the Bush Administration, because Islamic revival and resistance groups were challenging many of the illegitimate and tyrannical regimes that America had installed in the Muslim countries. Further, many of these resistance groups were gaining ground and were near to re-establishing the Islamic Caliphate, something that, according to Cheryl Bernard, a Zionist Jewess at the RAND Corporation, would result in America losing economic and political control, as well as, control over the oil and gas in the region.

"Rival versions (of Islamic movements) are contending for spiritual and political dominance. This conflict has serious costs and economic, social, political, and security implications for the rest of the world" (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, Pg. ix, summary)

"They hope to establish a violent political utopia across the Middle East, which they call a “Caliphate”…This caliphate would be a totalitarian Islamic empire encompassing all current and former Muslim lands, stretching from Europe to North Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia… “I'm not going to allow this to happen — and no future American President can allow it either.” (President George W. Bush in his Speech of September 5, 2006)

But can you please elaborate on the American government trying to change their religion?

Islam is a religion that has its own political, military, social, economic, and legal systems internally enshrined. Consequently, it will not allow any other religion, person, or system to change any of its systems for personal gain. Moreover, Islam has obliged its faithful adherents to preserve and protect its purity by physically opposing any and all rivals, which includes forming resistance groups. As a result of this, no invader can easily maintain control of the resources in Muslim lands long-term, and this is what bothers the would-be plunderer. For this reason, America finds it necessary to change the Islamic ideology.

"Fundamentalists reject democratic values and contemporary Western culture. They want an authoritarian, puritanical state that will implement their extreme view of Islamic law and morality. They are willing to use innovation and modern technology to achieve that goal…the radical fundamentalists are hostile to modern democracy, to Western values in general, and to the United States in particular…they oppose us and we oppose them." (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, Pg. x, summary, and pg.27)

So how does the RAND Corporation suggest that the American government changes Islam?

They suggest that America goes on an all out offensive against the basic teachings of Islam and its faithful followers that oppose the US agenda. This can be accomplished by demonizing and discrediting them in every way possible, including through the media, which would lead to these Muslims being unjustly harassed and imprisoned. According to RAND, this should be done in order to turn the masses of the Muslims in general and women in particular, against following and supporting Islam and to cause them to despise and disassociate from its true believers.

"Confront and oppose the fundamentalists. Challenge their interpretation of Islam and expose inaccuracies. Reveal their linkages to illegal groups and activities. Publicize the consequences of their violent acts. Demonstrate their inability to rule, to achieve positive development of their countries and communities. Address these messages especially to young people, to pious traditionalist populations, to Muslim minorities in the West, and to women. Avoid showing respect or admiration for the violent feats of fundamentalist extremists and terrorists. Cast them as disturbed and cowardly, not as evil heroes Encourage journalists to investigate issues of corruption, hypocrisy, and immorality in fundamentalist and terrorist circles. Encourage divisions among fundamentalists." (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, pg. 62, 64 )

Next, America should locate, recruit, and fully support "partners" from within the Muslim countries (conveniently called Modernists/Moderates/Democratic Muslims).

"Modernists want the Islamic world to become part of global modernity. They want to modernize and reform Islam, to bring it into line with the age." (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, Summary- pg. x)

According to RAND, these modernists must infiltrate the Muslims' education systems and media in their countries and covertly re-educate Muslim youth by promoting democracy, secularism and pre-Islamic culture (i.e. paganism).

"The next generation (of Muslims) can conceivably be influenced if the message of democratic Islam can be inserted into school curricula and public media in the pertinent countries...Position secularism and modernism as a “counterculture” option for disaffected Islamic youth. Facilitate and encourage an awareness of their pre- and non-Islamic history and culture, in the media and the curricula of relevant countries. Assist in the development of independent civic organizations, to promote civic culture." (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, pg. 63, )

But more importantly, the 'modernist Muslim partner' must REMOVE, CRIMINALIZE or DESTROY the following three concepts and aspects of Islam:

(1) the prohibition of having alliances with Islam's enemies,
(2) the obligation to implement Shariah Law in Muslim lands,
(3) the obligation of fighting (i.e. Jihad) against enemies of Islam (i.e. invaders and plunderers of Muslim lands and resources).

"Create role models and leaders (out of the modernists)…They should be cultivated and publicly presented as the face of contemporary Islam…Modernists who risk persecution should be built up as courageous civil rights leaders. Publish and distribute their works at subsidized cost. Encourage them to write for mass audiences and for youth. Introduce their views into the curriculum of Islamic education. Give them a public platform. Make their opinions and judgments on fundamental questions of religious interpretation available to a mass audience in competition with those of the fundamentalists and traditionalists, who have Web sites, publishing houses, schools, institutes, and many other vehicles for disseminating their views." (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, pg. 47, Pg. 60 appendix C, )

"The goal was to make it politically possible for Muslim governments to support the effort against terrorism (i.e. Jihad) by detaching the issue of terrorism (Jihad) from the issue of Islam". (Cheryl Bernard, RAND Publication, Civil Democratic Islam: Partners, Resources, Strategies, Chapter 1,pg2)

So has America been able to successfully implement RAND Corporation's suggestions and recommendations in the Muslim countries?
According to RAND Corporation's senior official Charles A. Goldman, yes they have. In 2001, at the beginning of the Crusade, RAND Corporation set up their camp in Qatar and teamed up with the local Supreme Education Council to put into effect all of the aforementioned plots and plans, making the Muslim children of Qatar to be the first 'guinea pigs' in this experiment. If everything goes according to their plans, these children will be the first generation of Muslims in the Middle East to blatantly love and ally themselves to their Crusading conquerors, and abhor both, their Islamic Shari'a and fighting to defend and preserve it.
"QATAR’S educational sector is bound to witness revolutionary changes in the coming years, feels US-based Rand Corporation senior official Charles A Goldman…The (RAND) corporation was commissioned in 2001 to examine Qatar’s K-12 (Kindergarten through Grade 12) school system. Speaking to Gulf Times yesterday, Goldman said the initiatives the Supreme Education Council (SEC) has kicked off would soon cross a major milestone with more than 50% of the total number of government-supported schools coming under the scheme by the year-end…The system has brought about changes in curriculum standards..." (Gulf Times, 'Qatar educational sector ‘to see revolutionary change', April 2007 )
However, realities on the ground (i.e. busted economies, Muslims' increasingly distrust of America, and growing popularity of insurgencies, and broken militaries) have forced the new leader of the Zio-Crusade, President Obama, the Pentagon, and others in his coalition to publicly admit that nearly 9 years of planning and launching covert and overt operations, spending of trillions of dollars to brainwash as well as to spill the blood of innocents people, and evident plundering of Iraqi oil have been to no real avail.
"The US is losing the war of ideas in the Islamic world, failing to promote its policies to Muslims wary of American intentions and hypocrisy, according to a Pentagon advisory panel." (US losing Fight for Muslim Minds, November 2004)
"Asked by the Times if the United States was winning the war in Afghanistan, which he has called the “central front in the war on terror”, Mr Obama simply replied: “No.”…“You’ve seen conditions deteriorate over the last couple of years. The Taliban is bolder than it was. I think in the southern regions of the country, you’re seeing them attack in ways that we have not seen previously,” he said…“The national government still has not gained the confidence of the Afghan people.” (Obama considers reaching out to Taliban, The Raw Story, 8 March 2009)

The UK's operation in Afghanistan is "worthless" and akin to the start of the Vietnam war, former SAS commander Maj Sebastian Morley has said…"We hold tiny areas of ground in Helmand and we are kidding ourselves if we think our influence goes beyond 500 metres of our security bases…"We go out on operations, have a punch-up with the Taleban and then go back to camp for tea. We are not holding the ground." (Afghan operation is 'worthless', BBC News , 7 March 2009)

Fellow freedom lovers, I remind you with the aforementioned proofs in order to make it clear to everyone that the 'War OF Terror' is a Crusade. It is a massive conspiracy to stop the Muslim people from establishing an Islamic State in their own part of the world. This Zio-Crusade is also scheme to control the resources in the Muslim countries. It is a plot to subjugate the Muslims masses by persecuting, jailing, and killing faithful Muslims while simultaneously placing stooges (i.e. Modernist 'Muslims') in key positions to change the teachings of the Islamic faith with the sole aim to brainwash the Muslim youth. I remind you with their words:
President George W. Bush:
"This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while."
"They hope to establish a violent political utopia across the Middle East, which they call a “Caliphate”…“I'm not going to allow this to happen — and no future American President can allow it either.”

Secretary of State Colin Powell:

"I called President Musharraf and said: 'We need your answer now. We need you as part of this campaign, this crusade',"

RAND Corporation:

"The dependence of the West and Japan on Persian Gulf oil and the POWER and WEALTH that come from CONTROLLING that oil guarantee US interest in that part of the world for as far into the future as anyone can see."

"Modernists (Stooge 'Muslims') want the Islamic world to become part of global modernity. They want to modernize and reform (CHANGE) Islam…The next generation (of Muslim Youth) can conceivably be influenced (by the Stooges) if the message of democratic (CHANGED) Islam can be inserted into school curricula and public media in the pertinent countries..."

Moreover, this absolutely shameful and reprehensible plot is supported by most of the world leaders and mainstream media outlets. Consequently, it goes without saying that these Zio-Crusaders have also placed their hirelings (called Disinformationalists) in every public forum, including this one. Their sole job is to confuse us by any means necessary so that we support the real enemy and oppose the freedom loving people. Some of the tactics of a disinformationalist:

1. proclaiming himself to be a religious advocate, but he will not adhere to the principles of his proclaimed religion, in his own actions. He might even be an ally of another player in the ploy who is an admitted atheist, or a socialist.

2. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into supporting hoaxes.

3. Dividing the defenders of liberty into fighting each other by creating strife among patriots.

4. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into creating class struggle by promoting ethnic hatred.

You can learn more about the Disinformationalist Tactics by doing a search on: Tactics of Disinformationists, Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation, Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist, by H. Michael Sweeney
HMS/-a-t-/proparanoid.com

If you look closely at the statements of some of the bloggers here, you will recognize that despite their proclaimed religion, they are undoubtedly on the payroll of the Crusader governments (i.e. FBI or CIA) or on that of the Zionist RAND Corporation.

For example, one of the bloggers claims to be a Muslim and claims to follow the Qur'an, yet she openly rejects the statements of the Prophet Muhammad (i.e. ahadeeth) asserting that they are man-made. She says:
"…Much of woes of Muslim women will be over if we follow Qur’an rather than these ahadith. Women lost in ahadith what they had gained through Qur’an." http://peacefulmusli...
She also says:

"…Since that is impossible (i.e. that you understand the meaning and context of the hadith) I can only assume that you pay more attention to the Hadith (which are MAN-made, not GOD-made) than the Quran. I do not. I believe what is clearly stated by God: There is no compulsion in religion…You are free to follow men (i.e. THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD (sws)) if you like. I will do my best to follow Allah…And yes, I believe in Hadith. I do not place them above Quran, though. http://peacefulmusli...
___________________________________________________________________

"I truly am not convinced that covering my hair is REQUIRED."
http://www.qatarlivi...

Well, according to the Qur'an itself and basic teachings of Islam, both Qur'an and hadeeth are Revelation from Allah which must be followed.

"Nor does he (Muhammad) speak of his own desire. It is only a Revelation revealed."
(Quran, Sura An-Najm, 53:3-4)

Moreover, anyone who rejects either the Qur'an or the authentic ahadeeth is committing an act which expels him from the religion because he is rejecting Allah's Revelation. The Qur'an specifically makes many statements strongly forbidding people from trying to make a distinction between the Qur'an and the teachings of the Messenger, and from opposing his legal verdicts and his way.

"Verily, those who disbelieve in Allah and His Messengers and wish to make distinction between Allah and His Messengers (by believing in Allah and disbelieving in His Messengers) saying, "We believe in some but reject others," and wish to adopt a way in between. THEY ARE IN TRUTH DISBELIEVERS. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating torment." (Quran, Sura An-Nisa, 4:150)

"And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad) after the right path has been shown clearly to him…We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell – what an evil destination. (Quran, Sura Nisa, 4:115)

"…And let those who oppose the Messenger's (Muhammad's) commandment (i.e. his Sunnah, ahadeeth) beware, lest some Fitnah (disbelief, trials, afflictions, earthuakes, killing) should befall them or a painful torment be inflicted on them." (Quran, Sura Al-Furqan, 24:63)

This same blogger is also one of the most zealous propagators of RAND Corporations' strategies (i.e. to go into the education system and persuade the Muslim children to abandon the Islamic Sharia'). Despite the fact that she is always claiming to believe in and follow the Qur'an, she openly declares that she rejects certain teachings in it and she calls the Muslim youth to reject it as well, under the guise of 'critical thinking'. For example, the Qur'an teaches that the Jews are the worst in enmity towards Muslims, and that Muslims should not take them as auliya (i.e. friends, protectors, or allies) or they will become one of them.

"Verily the ones who have the most enmity towards Muslims are the Jews and the pagans." (Surah Al-Maida, 5:82)

"Oh you who believe do not take the Jews and Christians as auliya (allies, protectors, confidents, friends), they are but auliya of each other. And if anyone from amongst you does so, then he is from amongst them." (Surah Al-Maida, 5:51)

"“Oh you who believe if you obey a group of the People of the Book they will render you as Kafirs after you have believed.” (Surah Al Imran, 3:100)

Yet this same Muslimah condones taking Jews and Christians as professors, teachers, and friends. She says:
"Well of course there are Jewish Professors in EC! And what is wrong with that? Need I remind Muslims that we are anjoined by Allah to be respectful to the People of The Book? "
http://qatar.livejou...
__________________________________________________________________

I have posted an extract from an article called "The Tactics of Disinformationists". After reading it, my advice would be to google the article, as well as, 2 others written by H. Michael Sweeney ("Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist", and "Twenty Five Ways to Suppress the Truth – The Rules of Disinformation"), read them in full. Then pass all of the info about the new Crusaders, the Modernist Muslims, and the disinformationists to other freedom loving people so that they can more easily recognize these enemies of freedom and they can warn others as well.

The Tactics of Disinformationists
"In the game of chess there exists a term; which describes a maneuver, a stratagem, and a ploy; using different pieces working together, to accomplish a secret purpose. This is called a gambit.

Those who hope to build totalitarian control over freedom loving people, also use many gambits. BUT, the chess player has the advantage of always knowing which pieces are on the other side. Those who would defend liberty have no such luxury. The most treacherous player in the gambit is the false patriot.
The false patriot will present himself as a defender of liberty, BUT he will spend most of his time attacking the defenders of liberty, under numerous pretenses. The false patriot will attempt to re-direct attention in every direction EXCEPT at those, who are building tyranny. The false patriot will attempt to re-direct attention to an entire race, a religion, a large group with a few problems, or even against patriots. This is essentially the very old military strategy of the creation a "decoy to draw enemy fire." The ultimate success of this deception is to cause defenders of liberty to "fire" on non-combatants, or even to "fire" on their own friends, and allies. In addition, the false patriot will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty. The false patriot, like every other player in the gambit, will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty by:
1. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into supporting hoaxes.
2. Dividing the defenders of liberty into fighting each other by creating strife among patriots.
3. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into creating class struggle by promoting ethnic hatred.
4. Attempting to waste the time of patriots, by forcing them to respond to personal attacks, or endless debate about trivia.
5. Using multiple aliases to create the appearance that there is someone, who believes them to be credible.
6. ABOVE ALL: Accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition.
THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMATIONISTS:

Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself...

It is VERY simple: Those who spend their time fighting tyranny, are patriots. Those who spend their time fighting patriots are working for the advancement of tyranny.

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation,by H. Michael Sweeney

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist, by H. Michael Sweeney
HMS/-a-t-/proparanoid.com