Offensive: AL JAZEERA TV SHOW !!!

I am exremely surprised by this.. is there a text of the offending interview ??

Was the show in English or Arabic ?

lets say you are the first one then.

And wait a minute A SHAIKH FROM EYGPT who with the fear of govt cant grow beard. they shouldnt be called any Islamic Scholar or Shaikh.

But see I will say that a true Muslim does not hate true christian and vice versa.
A true chrsitian will not eat pork because the true christian knows it is forbbiden, and will not have sex before marriage.
The point is that both Muslims and christians should follow their belief and do not deviate.
Today how many christians eat pork? Unfortunately Many eat
How many Muslims do not drink wine? Unfortunately Many drink
These are only some examples.
If this Sheikh says all then this is mistake, but I am sure he ment the majority.

its nonesense, co'z sheik sunni is the pig hahahaha

interligent person hahahah...LOL

Who cares, let him say what he wants about the west. Mere words do not hurt....

That sheikh is just seeking attention, he knows that a controversial statement would get him to front page of many newspapers...

Dont bother about useless jerks like him... :-)

I never heard a christiant hirarchy do the bad mouth on other religions.
__________________________________________________
The one who stays calm is the one who is in control

You've obviously never listened to the Pope Richierich. Everyone is entitled to free speech DaRuDe.

Need not to worry about at all.We all know where ALL are coming from. The human world & civilization bloomed at the TWO banks of a great river. And it was bloomed in PAPYRUS rolls just like scrolls.When they grew up, they used only TWO things. Pampers & Papers. Only TWO types of prodigies were born in the banks of this great river since the begining of the world.DOCTOOOOOOORS & MOHANTIS means Engineers.I never heard about any CAPABLE SHAKES among them were born to change the whole world with a TV chat show.

Just pay no heed to his interview excerpt. People will not accept anything that comes out from an oblivious mind...

Everyone have the right to speak but
Your freedom end at somebody else freedom.
...EKJ...

Who cares.....let him say what he thinks....after all, the world needs a little more amusement.
And who better to provide it than people like him.....lol

"Oh....just fark off...please"

Its interesting though, if you turn this around and remember the comments the Pope made a while back, its all treated a zionist-christain conspiracy against muslims and there were mass protests around the world. When the attack is by a senior muslim preacher people just laugh at him and get on with their lives.....

Lessons to be learned here I think...

Iam still requesting link for the vid or any text...this programme actually has plenty of episodes on youtube, however there is no such as mentioned by EagleofHeaven. How come no one even on QL has seen to confirm this?!

With this i certianly feel, this information is not true. Even if it is, why should the channel opologize ?!! is the Sheikh employed with AlJazeera?!! :D

~noms~
-----------------------------------------
"Before God we are all equally wise ' and equally foolish" - Albert Einstein

I always watch the show. It is true wat he the eagle said. the show is in arabic and it is on al jazeera channel. the name of the show is al itijaho al moaakes. the sunni shaikh was so offensive and even the other bahraini shaikh was laughing on him all the time and telling him that all what he is saying is wrong. it was not nice at all what the sunni said about chrisitans and jewish. i think he is egyptian. not sure.

I am not sure if the show was last week or the one before. Al jazeera should apologize because we, muslims, do not think the same way he does.those TV channels they do this on purpose to push more people to watch the show but this is not good. He didnt respect the other Shaikh even because he is shiia and he accused him of being a betrayer and he accused every muslim who sit with a chrisitian to be a betrayer because as per what he said that christians do not admitt that Prophet Mohammad, salla Allah 3alayhi wa sallam, exisits.

W.G.A.S. anymore!

---I belive in Me. I believe in You---

I also see this episode. Christian do not believe in Islam maybe because they come before or maybe because muslims think the bible is modified but afterall we must all respect each others and sorry for you Eagle_of_Heaven. We do not hate any chrisitian. We respect all. Al Jazeera should apologize eventhough it is the personal opinion of the crazy Shaikh. Who said he is Shaikh? he called himself like this but we dont want such Shaikhs. They ruine Islam reputation in the world.

Well, come to think of it...maybe the Christians SHOULD raise their voices...burn a few effigies etc...after all, it works for the Muslims.....

"Oh....just fark off...please"

U cant judge muslims or christians by 1 person if he is good or bad, polie or impolie.

Nothing is more relaxing than flying like an Eagle in Heaven !!

Peopleeeee!!! am not blaming anyone. am just asking al jazeera to apologize from all of us. even from muslims because they dont accept such statements. is it clear noww for you alll ???????????

getting parents into this wont make you winning, i promise this coz when saying he may be my father I could reply by one of your parents ... so easy ... LoL

so collect up your nerves, dont be childish, and i asked you to put the link from u-tube to prove i am the liar you didnt, Plus you never tell people to respect themselves coz they will respect you only if you are respectable big boy...

Plus i am so eager why on earth would you view my profile so that you could answer with anything ... wierdo

I dont have problems either with Sunni or She3a, those problems are there at your country, where they have bloody fights and wars all along with others.

I hate mentioning any person or people with bad names, that's in general, i feel its mean, and IF there was such a programme, there are also alot of other programmes that mention bad names, and features on sunna also, no big deal, so why we get only this phase?

and never be this aggressive again, plz you are on a "respectable" site ... :)so smile

N.F SHAKIB

Home: Channel Programs: opposite direction

Interfaith Dialogue

Interviewer: FQ
Guest:
- By Kristin Erekson / Chairman of the Center for Cultural Dialogue Bahrain
- IK / professor at Al Azhar University
Date: 27/10/2009

- The feasibility of inter-religious dialogue and objectives
- Participants and constraints on inter-religious dialogue
- The impact of the political, military and cultural
- Mutual recognition and the prospects for dialogue

FQ

By Kristin Erekson

IK

FQ: Greetings Dear viewers. Why is the dialogue of religions fashion over the past few years does not go only in this city or that a conference of elders and rabbis, priests and bishops? Dialogue is not merely an occasion to eat buffets open no more, no less? Religious dialogue is not just the alleged overt political cover for the horrors of the bloody military exercised by America and Israel and the West in general against Arabs and Muslims? How to talk to the siege of Gaza and desecrate Al-Aqsa Mosque and prevent water and medicine for our children? How to talk with those who take the lives of innocent people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia, as if they were a flock of chickens? When dialogue with the wolf pregnant? Not the only language of dialogue with the invaders and occupiers is the resistance in all its forms? How Othaor with the Vatican are not the only boss of the Nile of Islam, and Christianity in a Muslim country? Adds another, how to hold a dialogue with religions do not recognize and not the Koran does not Brcolna Bmekdsatna? Did not one of them comes to ask the Muslims to abandon the Koran condition for dialogue? On the other hand, how other Muslims engage in dialogue if they disbelieve each other for trivial reasons? When dialogue among Muslims throughout history, but Balshak and right? Adds another, is not missing something can not give him? Not full of religious invocation rude speeches to followers of other religions? How Nhaor we call the descendents of monkeys and pigs? Or that the extremists in all religions are the minority could be overcome? Not prefer the vast majority of Muslims, Christians and Jews dialogue and rapprochement on the conflict and rivalry? Is it not incumbent upon us to stand in honor and esteem of all States and those working to heal the rift between the followers of divine religions and clerics gathered from various flung around the same table? Are questions I ask on the air directly to Dr. IK, a professor at Al-Azhar University and the President of the Center for Cultural Dialogue Bahrain Mr. Zia al-Musawi, we begin the discussion after the break.

[Ad break]

The feasibility of inter-religious dialogue and objectives

FQ: Welcome again Dear viewers, we are with you on the air directly in the opposite direction, you can vote on the subject of this episode, do you support the dialogue between the religions? A result of close, 50,9% Yes, 49.1% said no. Mr. Moussaoui, if you started, do you think that there are actually the feasibility of dialogue between religions? Other means to say this happened interfaith dialogue over the past few years are the means by exercise in public relations and appropriate to the charge Alibovyat.

Dhia al-Musawi: public relations. In the name of God the Merciful. I believe that the love between Christians and religious Jews and Muslims had to crawl but he does not die, that's true ..

FQ: creeps.

Dhia al-Musawi: crawl but does not die, why? Because God created us to be united and living in a state of love, therefore, say to all those who Itouhmon into the flesh of tolerance between religions, those who Itouhmon to instill a lot of daggers in the side of religious extremists, they are Christian or Muslim extremists, Jewish extremists tell them that our choice to cultivate a tree jasmine important circumstances, is not interested in political projects, military projects are established for political pragmatism, but what we want, religions, religions and political projects something else so if there is anemia of tolerance or anemia is due to the coexistence of politicians, and he says Anis Mansour, "Policy Art Ribaldries elegant ", these are behind the destruction of rations between religions, but what is stopping you from Christian to live in my heart and to live a Muslim and to live in my heart all these communities ..

FQ: and Judaism.

Dhia al-Musawi: The Jewish and not all Jews are with Israel and Zionism, than with those not with them but with the moderates who stand with human rights, and so I think that the alliance of religion and the devil mafia mafia politics are behind what we are living from destroying what we are experiencing double what we live by the disintegration of this role as clergy, pastors, our images, that the various mines tend accumulated on the letter, if Sfina hearts that we can move, Begin said at the outset as a kind of food, public relations, but in the end would reach the level of the best that I call from this location to party human rights is because the party which avoids this map of the brides of blood, what's the point to be destroyed churches in Iraq, the destruction of mosques in Iraq, the destruction of funerals in Iraq? What's the use .. Therefore I say to the victims not only of Muslims, Israeli armored kill the Christian and Muslim was also killed, there are dozens of dozens of Christian and Muslim victims of the occupation and enterprise projects, it means that you let them? Does that mean not live the Christian love toward or towards other religions? Therefore, I say do not clash of civilizations as Huntington said no end of history as Fukuyama said, but would like the ridiculousness, the conflict platitudes and not a conflict of civilizations and to say that extremists are different genes, but DNA and one for those who want to preserve the snoring year in order to live the nation vulnerable and ignorant, they are apart reject dialogue, arguing that Israel or the pretext of America, these things and dialogue thing, I respect his religion, but I am not responsible for all those, so I say down with the theory that Islam is a terrorist or fascist, extreme right does not discriminate between Muslim and non-Muslims, these extremists want to destroy everyone so I can say and fall saying God curse the Jews and the Christians, descendants of apes and pigs and say Long live love and respect between religions Christ, I have my privacy, but I respect the Islamic Christian and I respect the rest.

FQ: beautiful. Dr.. Hair.

IK: In the name of God the Merciful. I mean I think our brothers in the Christian and Jewish communities in the provision of the Nobel Prize for brother.

FQ: providing the Nobel Prize.

IK: Yes. No love, man?! Any love talking about? Are you believe the Mother of God, who says you will not be satisfied (Jews and Christians until you follow their religion ..) [Baqarah: 120], do not try to interpretation, can not. You will not accept the Jews and Christians but that I gave up on religion and engaged in their religion, talk of? Who knows the intentions and familiar with the subcontractor and not apparent is hidden tricks of human beings, the beginning. I. Title dialogue religions misleading and a lie ..

FQ: a lie?

IK: Yes, there is no heavenly religions, but religion in one God, Islam from Adam to Muhammad to seal peace be upon him, but no word religion in the Koran, nor in a single year, but did not come Mtnap not set. Vgaip religions lie and to lend a heavenly church on his craft and steer the testimony of the Koran and the Jewish text, the heavenly fire to deceive, to mislead the Muslim and non-Muslims, misled for a Muslim because they Tohmh that these are talking about right as he said in the past Said Ashmawi and agents who likes the Masons, who believes Torah and believe the gospel as one who believes the Koran, the three on the right and the three survivors. This man dropped the phrase Islam and dropped the Qur'aan and the Koran takes the form of a lie when he says such nonsense and I repeated it at the time a lot, Vhawwar religions lie and deceive, to mislead the non-Muslim because it is concealed from the search for the truth to make him feel that he is right ..

FQ: It is not right.

IK: It is wrong, this counterfeiting, fraud and misleading ..

FQ: mean three-quarters of human vanity.

IK: The Muslim also makes misleading as it may think, as long as this right and they are superior in material progress and civil progress in the level of their lives better, why not enter the Jewish or Christian as long as all alike? Misleading invalid should not be clicked in any form. The other thing, there is no religious right is not in the sense that the Christians and the Jews, but these .. Do you know that the first brother priests and colonialism has been Orientalists who worshiped the way for the colonization and invasion of the Islamic world and the alienation of Muslims from their religion were originally clerics? Do you know that the instigators of the Crusades and publishers of Islamophobia in Europe were religious? With any men talking about? Clergy? A witness from her family soon, the Pope issued what is known today by the Pope in 1981 was the previous nine thousand missionaries at one time in Africa, was frank when asked said Stop The Islamic tide from Africa, when he stepped on the land of Egypt before and people said my peace of humility, I lied and Jhiltm but before a symbolic kiss says he said اللمبي Here we promised you, Salah al-Din, which means that Egypt will return as it was Christian before Islam. With the talking? Then the dialogue as stated in the introduction dialogue pregnancy with lamb and the wolf is the Muslim side and the wolf is the other party and, when he chose a Muslim symbol of pregnancy because the bond restrictions, the first of which being that his religion would oblige him to recognize Moses and Jesus acknowledges and recognizes the gospel of the house and revealed the Torah and not on the other side of what they need this recognition and until now the Koran and maker of human and Mohammad lie and manufacture of manufacture and paper ibn Nawfal, Khadija and said that Khalil Abdul Karim manufacturing the Prophet and said Qimni Finally, in the nonsense that he was saying recently, with the interlocutor? This one. Then ..

FQ: in a nutshell.

IK: pregnancy and Muslim which is the Muslim side is weak LES? Because it is not behind it, not support systems or governments or from society and, even, then it is a weak logic of another, not behind Islamic civilization as it should be based on it and say this is what the Islam, but in this age of underdevelopment, and the other says the Christian civilization that is manufactured by a humanity as it is presented Fmah support is based on the last missing from the Muslim side, then the potential without limits or the potential at all to this party, how is the dialogue?

Participants and constraints on inter-religious dialogue

FQ: How is the dialogue?

Dhia al-Musawi: My brother I. ..

IK (interrupting): I love the story and the brother to get rid of this tale of love de, love ..

FQ: Ya Reit get rid of this tale of love and love and jasmine ..

IK: Do not even look at you look at the other.

Dhia al-Musawi: Wherever there found love God so I can say for the first of the verses (you will not be satisfied with the Jews and Christians ..}..

IK (interrupting): It is like the devil I love God?

Dhia al-Musawi: I did not Oqatek ..

IK: No, no, I just can not Oqatek.

Dhia al-Musawi: (you will not be satisfied with the Jews and Christians ..) Every man every world religion of all sheikhs interpreter can be interpreted in their own way, out of historical context first, second thing, there are explanations for sectarian doctrinal interpretations will not end, as the saying goes, the devil is English in the details, this first. The second inter-religious dialogue, with respect to .. There is also a moderate, why always focus on the dark side? If there are priests, and so came the Crusades, and so on, there are many of them priests who lend a helping hand who speak of the Prophet Muhammad, blessings and peace and blessings of Islam and the pictures are very bright and beautiful, Khalil Gibran, Bernard Shaw praised the prophet and his family him, English ..

FQ: Goethe.

Dhia al-Musawi: Duran also in the story of civilization, Aytac spoke about the Prophet and Islam ..

FQ: great thinkers, philosophers, said Westerners talk about Islam and the great apostle.

Dhia al-Musawi: even better sometimes even characterized as Muslims in the Prophet and the City, etc., and William Moore in his book "Life of Muhammad", a lot of .. George Jurdak, Paul peace, all Halchristien Olekayam and take them into the sea on the grounds that there are extremists and stood against Islam? This is not true, if we use the method of dialogue rather than blood dialogue tree we Yasmeen Why? We will eliminate all those. Realistically, now there are mosques in Europe, three hundred mosques in the Netherlands, 141 mosques in Germany, 1500 mosques in France, Alpha mosque in America, if we cancel Ilgonna Ngheihm and mosques, cancel twenty million Muslims and Arabs in Europe and Ilqounam at sea and we come to the Christians and churches in the Middle East or in the Arab and Muslim world and put them into the sea! Is this the solution? Ever, the solution is what? Is to cooperate to reach out to the participants is why I say ..

FQ (interrupting): What are the participants?

Dhia al-Musawi: Many of the participants in cross-fertilization of course, means better spar to establish a human presence, is there more beautiful than party rights? Is there a most beautiful of human thought? Is there ..

FQ (interrupting): Oh man you're a person utopian.

Dhia al-Musawi: No, no, I'm not a utopian ..

Faisal al-Qassem: You are utopian.

Dhia al-Musawi: No, no, please, I'm not a utopian and I'm not a dreamer and I'm not romantic. Civilization, to speak on the issue of civilization, this civilization not bring us? Civilization is a blood circulation, blood circulation of the blood of many Asian Confucian civilization, Islamic civilization, civilization .. All of these participated in this culture, I say civilization we share, the love of God also brings us together, all these things we have to deal will either ..

FQ (interrupting): your match in the creation.

Dhia al-Musawi: Add, (We have honored the sons of Adam ..) [al-Isra: 70] did not say only honored the Muslim, (We have honored the sons of Adam ..). If the issue if we have committed ourselves to the factor of the cancellation, the cancellation of mutual brutal style we used cholesterol cultural and ideological cement to prevent it from coming to us on the contrary, we must enter the church to take lectures and teach them about Islam and the beauty of Islam and the position of the prophet and his family and companions and the position of peace with Christians, there is the scenery and historical positions very nice reflect the state of moderation, the Imam Ali peace be upon him his position, over the Church was one of his companions says as long as God involved here said to him, not less so, but say as long as Abdullah here. So here's why the prophet said .. If we come to the verses, the Koran says (Say: O People of the Book Come to a word between us and you only worship God ..) [Al-Imran: 64] did not say Come Come pistol to kill, slaughter, genocide and the dissemination of brides of blood, I say this is our position. To turn to history as Dr. speak about history, the Abbasid state was to come for Christians to translate Greek philosophy, there are many common factors, too, in human rights can meet in civilization meet in technology in many things, if everyone shut the door and said we have to deal language knife, it will not be there .. Iraq to see what happens.

FQ: Dr..

IK: There is nothing wrong, first brother went quite far away from the framework of dialogue and what we mean, not our words now mean that the alternative is the challenge and the alternative is the conflict and the alternative is war, and that the alternative was to annihilate the other hand, this lies, not true. But you want to put things in perspective, how to run a serious dialogue between the Secretary sincerely committed to Islam and the self-other religions - religions do not say - irrespective of any religion enters the dialogue of, here are issues that can Twsal. Who can say that we have .. First, the dialogue is deliberately selective and arbitrary, no dialogue on the doctrine of no debate on the law, a dialogue on the ethics of common and basic tolerance, and it reminded me I will be tolerant, because the disaster behind him ..

Dhia al-Musawi: I remember you.

IK: Yes, the issue is not that easy, the Arab proverb says you're anxious and I Maiq When we agree? Between Islam and Christianity and Judaism is a fundamental contradiction at the origin of faith, the faith of Islam Tawhid and absolute transcendence (Say: God is the One, Allah, the Eternal, no evidence has been born, and not unto Him) [Sincerity: 1 - 4] offset "in the name of the Father and the Son and the Spirit Jerusalem is one God ", who can reconcile the contradictory? Impossibility. Quran says is not nothing like Him, and Christians, God made human beings eat and drink and enter the toilet and the Jews and Cbhaoh Jsmoh, a contradiction is not a solution. Objective here eh? What he said the Quran (me my religion your religion) [unbelievers: 6], Vlieterv each other's right to believe that his religion is right and the other's religion is false, not offense, and not stand a hostile attitude towards him, but explain to him the proof and evidence reveals the truth in this side and false in the other side. Then (no compulsion in religion ..) [Baqarah: 256] pressure, but not Islam, he is to influence people to change the belief or conversion of his heart a belief or means to make it saturated and tends to the idea without conviction ..

FQ (interrupting): Well this is the goal of interfaith dialogue ..

IK (following up): to make it a fatal temptation.

FQ: This is the dialogue of religions, ok, you mean attacking the dialogue of religions and supported by now, this is the idea that talking about them.

IK: no idea ..

Dhia al-Musawi: schizophrenia has become ..

IK: said eh?

FQ: schizophrenia, intellectual schizophrenia.

IK: no idea, man? Any idea?

FQ: This idea ..

IK: Think you have schizophrenia you.

FQ: This is you say intellectual schizophrenia.

IK: schizophrenia and you have him.

FQ: How do I have schizophrenia? How?

IK: VBulletin Experience because you did what you said ..

FQ: How?

IK: I said they were trapped in a narrow circle of dialogue is rigged. Then what are the ethics in common? Ethics of adultery and pornography, homosexuality morals, ethics marriage of monks in the churches, the contract for a man to man, is permissible to have women without marriage, this is civilization?! This civilization's talking about the brother? This fall a human sludge reached the minimum of sludge, animal and imagine that the evil brother and is no longer an emergency love ..

FQ: and jasmine.

IK: This verbiage nonsense written issue of the establishment. Who? Was the world narrowed my son Adam to Cain killed Abel? Evil in human nature, man, one of the laboratories, human trials and, in the composition creates a sound natural disposition, and then departs, "I created all Ebadi Vajtalthm none but demons from their religion," we still want to put things in perspective, I am a Muslim it is my right to say that Islam is Brahini as well as the right, what I think when the other - without excavation, without reasons and without any form of abuse - is invalid ..

FQ: But you ..

IK: he has the right to believe as well is that what I say is right and what you have you .. Yes, it remains a solution eh? That the safest for you in your right to embrace what you want me to recognize and embrace what I want and be how to deal with us is the handling of peer-based humanitarian and all ..

FQ (interrupting): Well this is what he said ..

IK: no.

FQ: This is what he said.

IK: said to be unfounded, man.

FQ: How to be unfounded?

IK: tolerance is talking about what comes behind him and behind the demolition of the spirit of resistance against war and against aggression and against the abuse in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and on the spirit of jihad in this nation and make them surrender, if he recites the brother saw the experience of history and Ahmed Khan, Ahmed Khan in India and how The same role played by the participants in interfaith dialogue of Muslims to adapt to the enemy and enable the enemy to control the enemy and to make this acceptable to the majority of Muslims and break the jihad to playing what he says and what the debtor says.

The impact of the political, military and cultural

FQ: beautiful. Mr. Moussaoui, I ask you a question, I mean, you want to go back to love and love, jasmine and party rights and all this talk, ok - Lord - How to engage in dialogue? - I mean, the street questions questions simple man, not my questions - how to engage in dialogue with those who kill children and prevent the medicine and water to people in Gaza and is used phosphorus? How to conduct a dialogue with the Americans, who at this moment annihilating the Afghan and Pakistani Kosrab of chicken? How to conduct a dialogue with the Somali people to kill? How to engage in dialogue with the slaughter of Iraqis? Ok you tell me that the policy is different from the religion, good and understand that this person who they negotiate that you - the U.S., which they negotiate in interfaith dialogue - whose father, uncle, brother, pilot or tank commander Lebed Muslims and kill them as well? Told you that this dialogue interfaith dialogue is a cover for the atrocities committed by military vessels the West against Muslims, Jay laugh for us, my man!

Dhia al-Musawi: You mean all the Muslims who are now talking in the dialogue of religions, all against Gaza and against the pain of Muslims? This talk Structural and beautiful hair means Qabbani ..

FQ (interrupting): How do you mean? This installation! These are facts, man.

Dhia al-Musawi: let me speak.

FQ: er, favors.

Dhia al-Musawi: first in the difference between a political and military project and the draft religion, I am talking about the dialogue of religions, ISH entered the tank now and the Iraq war and the war in Afghanistan? I do not speak for the military, I am talking about religions ..

FQ (interrupting): policy impact on religion, interfaith dialogue is a political game and not religious.

Dhia al-Musawi (interrupting): No, no, never, never.

FQ: a political game.

Dhia al-Musawi: Let me speak. If .. Even in Islam there are extremists working on the employment of Islam to their goals, politics is the art Ribaldries elegant, politics Sea of impurities, said Shaikh Mohammed Abdu I seek refuge in Allah from the word politicians and Handler and founded, the policy is distributed religious drug for control of the people and for the maintenance of snoring General and the influence it, and I'm not talking about military projects I am very clear and precise ..

FQ: and political.

Dhia al-Musawi: and political. Speak about interfaith dialogue, I speak how I stand with this .. Are all .. Now there is not harmed by the Christians because of Israel or because of the American occupation in Iraq? Many Christians and many Muslims, I am talking about these, this first. The second issue is their fault? What sin of the Muslim if born in a Muslim home? Those born in a Muslim home would be a Muslim, those born in Rome will be a Christian, those born in the house will be an Asian Buddhist Buddhist, and so is life, the nature of the stampede of social, will not come on all over the world Pethol wear clothes and eat one dish and one rack-and-one, this one. The question is very necessary, Mr. Fadel spoke of civilization, unfortunately there is a process a process of piecemeal selective reading of civilization, civilization is now talk of civilization, unfortunately we're dealing with a civilization, I call human civilization and Western civilization, not because everyone involved in this civilization ..

FQ: contributor, yes.

Dhia al-Musawi: Yes. Users with the civilization of someone who does not see the palace but a litter box, and God in the present problems, is .. Exist in every culture problems I mean, we thank God that the problems of our civilization?! This is first. The second thing is reduced to what civilization - civilization great - the question of homosexuality only? Anomalies of accepting homosexuality? There are Western countries also organizations ..

FQ (interrupting): But you said the monks, told you that homosexuality exists within the monasteries, and does not?

Dhia al-Musawi: exist, are all the monks? This is first ..

IK (interrupting): While I Thaoarham.

Dhia al-Musawi: You do not ..

FQ: While I Thaoarham.

IK: Yes.

Dhia al-Musawi: No, Who told you? You guide them? You have documentation? This is first, Professor, I do Qatatk I will continue this, the culture of democracy, the civil state of civilization, a civilization is the fruit of citizenship, human rights, why industrial revolution was canceled? Why abolished philosophy? Philosophy in which the many things, if they get sick or I got sick, Dr. Hnrdja Win? To European hospitals, if we go back if the rejection of Western civilization will turn now to Al-Jazeera and go on a camel and not on the plane, this thing. The other thing, from the repeal of civilization? Civilization Sorbonne University, the University of Oxford? All this I say, Sir, Mr. tell you all .. Picasso in colors of civilization, the Eiffel architecture, philosophy, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Khaldoun in his introduction, in his criticism of Descartes, Balzac in the literature, so you say, Mr. Odlq Parisian perfume and remove your watch and take a Swiss and Dutch Rdtk If you want to eliminate civilization, civilization is a beautiful thing very negative, but we reject positive is consistent with our religion is consistent with our civilization, we can live with him and say, Let us make it as it is, China by the Japanese, all Malaysians have benefited from Western civilization, including the beautiful things and refused to others beautiful things, if this is life, life to take beautiful things and rejects the things of others .. Therefore, China has grown and we continue to live and cry over spilled milk and Ntdkhm Bnrjsutna, we live these concerns and Alhoamat property and the intellectual cholesterol appellant and aggregated on the awareness of the joints that can not develop the Arab world to benefit from the experiences of others.

FQ: Very nice ..

IK: Correction ..

FQ (following up): Doctor, corrected, but I ask you a question as I asked there. How do you start with Othaor who do not recognize me? How Othaor with insulting the Mekdsate? How Othaor with whoever wants to be victorious in my communities? How and how? They are good on the other side can ask the same question, you mean how to engage in dialogue with those designated by descendents of monkeys and pigs? I mean, how you negotiate other religions if you're Muslim you can not dialogue with you? I mean you disbelieve each other for trivial reasons and all these things and call on all other religions, God is what Baraf Shaw, Oh what Baraf Shaw ..

Dhia al-Musawi: dispersed respondents, destroyed them ..

FQ: Xu yet?

Dhia al-Musawi: kill them. If Maine Bejebha cars destroyed them? I mean I do not understand, Maine Bibjeeb medicine for diabetes mean?

IK: This mix you and brother ..

FQ (interrupting): How do I mix? You are working Keda does not?

IK: بس correct what you hear you, brother.

FQ: Please, correct me.

IK: First of two parts .. Civilization

FQ: time is running Sheikh.

IK: construction of a physical building, my soul, the spiritual aspect of civilization is the culture in all its meaning, the part material is material progress in the buildings in the progress of all the industries of the industrial revolution produced de material progress, this material progress is not a factor in the measure of a civilization, this is a civilian, this civilian. The second aspect of civilization, religion, ethics laws, legislation behavior. And has confused you that you have .. Comparison between now eh? Dialogue between religion and religion and not among the followers of the religion and the followers of the religion, we are not Muslims - must fill out our mouth we say - and do not represent Islam nor he nor I, between us and Islam is a very large distance very, very, even if our Islam to these people - not fanatics are men Religion - as it is in writing and documents to enter the religion of Allaah in crowds as people's incomes as before, but we offer ourselves. Therefore here to ask a question, who is speaking on behalf of Islam in the dialogue and which is represented? A graduate of Commerce in Egypt, Amr Khaled and Sheikh Juma! A representative? Then, if such brother, Islam will be represented in the dialogue Ptsourh is, if I represented Somthelh Ptsouri and I imagine that Islam is misleading because it was incomplete and false and his vision of Islam is invalid because it was incomplete and false if we give people a distorted image of Islam under the pretext of correcting the image of Islam have, we make it more darker and make it more worse. Then, when Othaor with those who deny that the Koran is revealed and that Muhammad is the Messenger Does not this mean skeptical of all Muslims in their religion? Therefore not be deposited on the other side of that which is on the right? And therefore the brother to abolish the duty of communication, our Lord said that you (.. ..) but the author [Shura: 48] author is the duty of Muslims with wisdom and fair preaching, and not say a knife, the stick and the tank and Alaptap and verse and er, not true, and when we talk about the Taliban and the resistance in Iraq and in Palestine extremists, criminals are being slaughtered not have to put things in perspective, the Islamic Jihad's project. And the cause of Muslims that should be there soon as soon as our three taboos prohibited by the West against Muslims, the first by a unit of any kind on any level in the Arab or Muslim world, even if sincere scholars of Islam and the Union of Islamic scholars who are sincere and faithful of the Islamic Conference and the Association of .. Was the first of their goals unite the nation and remove barriers to this unit, one. Prevent the establishment of two significant power in the land of Islam, why oppressive Jewish state already has a nuclear arsenal and is prohibited on Iran? Why? Because it is forbidden on the strength of Islamic, why hit the Iraqi reactor, a battle fought against Iran for the West? Because it is forbidden? It in principle. Third, forbidden by the Islamic regime carries the banner of Islam, under any pretext and in any level and this is what is behind the hitting of the Taliban, the Taliban invaded America? Then the ability to invade America? Then you deny the right of the brother of Afghan Taliban and the right ..

FQ: and the Iraqis.

IK: the right of Iraqis.

FQ: and Somalis.

IK: the right of the Palestinians and Somalis and all of the occupied land, looted their rights and struggling to resist and fight with all means to recover the rights?

FQ: In short, if the only possible dialogue with them what are they? Resistance.

IK: the establishment of dialogue on the origins ..

FQ: In short, time is running out.

IK: Yes No totals matters through dialogue - as I said - selective deceptive masks of goals than appears, do not be a puppet in their hands.

Mutual recognition and the prospects for dialogue

FQ: Mr. Moussaoui, I ask you a question, how to engage in dialogue - and this is a good question -..

Dhia al-Musawi: and answered.

FQ: Just a minute. No, this is another question though! How to engage in dialogue with those who do not recognize you? This is the question, I ask you, before the period ..

IK: acknowledge your religion.

FQ: your religion, minutes. First time ago there was a meeting between the leaders of leading Muslim - I do not want to mention his name Minshan displeased with what I mean, our last program was a week .. Before the period - in his presence, said one participant, in his presence Ah, in the presence of a very large Arab sheikh, "If you want to Taathaoroa with the West, you have to give up on the Koran condition for dialogue. How well you engage in dialogue with those who do not recognize Baqrank does not recognize Brcolk does not recognize your message does not recognize your religion? Christianity and Islam does not recognize some of Islam, while Islam recognizes Christianity and the religion of Christianity and Christian prophets, I ask how a conversation with somebody Abieterv you?

Eagle, i feel with you, i completely condemn the words of the sheikh in the interview, but i think some here said it right, it's not al jazeera nor Qatar's problem that an ignorant is saying whatever he's saying, forget it all, ignorant are so hollow that they float and can be seen.

Yalla!

Rules are a guideline for intelligent people, but they must be adhered to by idiots.

i think this translation is a google translation or something, that most of the times has syntax errors.... me no understand any thing.. gave me eyestrain... now me have headache.

but i still stand by what i posted earlier today.

I really understand your feeling Mr. Eagle because such a behavior on TV makes you so angry. You have the right to call for an apologize but TV Channels never do this. The best thing is to let it go but you have the full right to comment and to express your feelings. noha and all QL friends: take it easy. put urself in his place. lets stop that debate.

Is what AlJazera is all about, I think it's OK for this to be said as it lets people know just what sort of lunacy there is out there.

The BBC recently let Nick Griffin leader of the BNP onto question Time, people complained.

But it's only when people hear how ludicrous their point of view is that they then fully understand the stupidity of the speaker and the argument.

The more loons you see on TV the better as more people will condone them and eventually ignore them.

Same thing happened with that Dutch MP with his anti-islam film, a big fuss was made and he was banned from the UK, eventually he won the right to come to the UK he showed the film, every realized he was a nut and then quietly ignored him.

In this case we should do the same, of course had he said this about Islam then I am sure AlJazeera would be on fire right now but that's a different story.

yeah.... right.... The only thing they are "pro" about is Al-Qaeda, Ahmedinajad and Hamas.

 

 

 

I didn't drink the kool-aid! -- PM

i went through the first few lines of the translated text, and it made me dizzy, so i posted it here for someone to make a better interpretation