London’s High Court on Wednesday confirmed that Qatar Foundation (QF) lawfully terminated its £1.9bn hospital contract with a joint venture (JV) of construction firms Contrack and London-listed OHL.

The High Court (HC) rejected the JV’s challenge against a November 2018 arbitration award, which found among other things that that QF lawfully terminated its contract to design and construct the state-of-the-art Sidra Hospital in Education City, Doha.

According to a statement issued by QF, the High Court judgment noted that arbitration challenges are "not to be used simply because one of the parties is dissatisfied with the result" and praised the arbitration Tribunal as "eminent and highly experienced."

المحكمة العليا في المملكة المتحدة تؤكد أن مؤسسة قطر للتربية والعلوم وتنمية المجتمع، أنهت وبشكل قانوني سليم، عقدا قيمته تقدر بـ2.34 مليار دولار أمريكي، كان قد تم توقيعه في مشروع مشترك مع شركتي "كونتراك" و"أو أتش أل" - المدرجتين في بورصة لندن - للإنشاءات. #قنا

— وكالة الأنباء القطرية (@QatarNewsAgency) October 2, 2019

QF claims hundreds of millions of dollars in the ongoing arbitration, with further hearings scheduled to deal with issues including the recovery of additional costs to complete construction.

A major contributor to the Qatari construction sector, QF continues to partner with international construction businesses on some of the most innovative construction projects in the region.

General Counsel for Qatar Foundation, Mike Mitchell said, “Qatar Foundation is pleased that the court has confirmed our approach to this arbitration. We have always maintained that the JV’s challenge represented a futile last-ditch effort to evade accountability for their significant delays and defaults in delivering the Sidra project. We now look forward to concluding the arbitration and obtaining an appropriate monetary award.”

QF engaged the JV in 2009 to design and construct Sidra Hospital. The original contract price for the hospital was approximately £1.9bn. QF terminated its contract, and immediately commenced arbitration proceedings against the JV, in July 2014 alleging defaults and delays to construction.

In November 2018 the Tribunal issued an award, finding (among other things) that QF had lawfully exercised the termination provisions for default under the Contract and that QF had been entitled to make its calls on performance and advance payment guarantees.

The JV challenged the award on the basis of “serious irregularity”. The JV sought that the award is remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.

--

Make sure to check out our social media to keep track of the latest content.

Instagram - @qatarliving

Twitter - @qatarliving

Facebook - Qatar Living

Source: Gulf Times